DEVIL – SATAN – SERPENT

DEVIL – SATAN - SERPENT

This study is an in depth FULL study of every occurrence of 'Devil', 'Satan', 'Serpent', beginning with the SERPENT. We will then cover DEVIL and conclude with SATAN. This study will also cover 'Sons of God', 'Prince of the power of the air', Prince of this World', 'God of this World', Nephilim, Giants and other related terms, Michael, the Angels that sinned.

Demons and Unclean Spirits is a separate study that covers 'devil's', unclean spirits, demons and demoniacs.

Quick Reference Charts and a Picture Book is available, links at the end of this document.

This study is a compilation of research and information from many sources ranging from Pulpit Commenaries of (Gill, Barnes, Benson, Bullinger, Clarke, Geneva, JFB, Meyer, Wesley, etc.)(bible Hermeneutics forums, Academic papers, sermons past/present, traditional views/alternative interpretations, dictionaries/lexicons/Strong's and other Bible Study tools), anything else I could get my hands on, and some help from the Holy Spirit. Praise Yahweh the Lord God of Yisra'el.

I pray you put aside your preconceived notions and understanding, be open-minded, and just entertain what we are about to uncover.

Let's get into it:

The Word "Serpent"

The term "serpent" is a key symbol in biblical texts, often associated with Satan, the devil, or the dragon, particularly in the Book of Revelation. To understand its significance, we must carefully examine its biblical context, beginning with its first mention in Genesis 3:

The Serpent in Genesis

Genesis 3:1 introduces the serpent as “more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” The Hebrew word for serpent is nachash (H5175), defined in Strong’s Concordance as:

• "To hiss, that is, whisper a (magic) spell,", prognosticator, learn by experience, diligently observe

• A "snake”

The narrative continues:

• The serpent speaks to Eve, leading her to question God’s command.

• Eve blames the serpent for her disobedience, saying she was “beguiled” (Genesis 3:13).

• God curses the serpent, saying:
  "Upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life" (Genesis 3:14).

Key Observations:

• The serpent is not definitively described as a "beast of the field" but as being subtler than one.

• It can communicate with Eve.

• God speaks directly to the serpent, cursing it.

• The serpent’s life is finite, as implied by "all the days of thy life."

Cross-References in Scripture:

• 2Corinthians 11:3-4: Paul warns the Corinthians against being "beguiled" like Eve, equating the serpent's actions to false teachers preaching "another Jesus" or "another gospel."

• Genesis 3:2-5: The serpent’s deception is a distortion of God's Word, not a supernatural act. Paul’s comparison suggests that people, not a supernatural being, fulfills this role.

Genesis 3:1 ​​ Now the serpent (H5175) was more subtil than any beast of the field which Yahweh God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Serpent in the Hebrew is H5175 nachash (noun). It means enchanter, learn by experience, practice divination, diligently observe; a snake (from its hiss) (whisper). ​​ 

Someone can have “a bright idea”, and nachash, or 'serpent' means 'bright' or 'shining'. A bright idea to us may be adversarial to God.

Serpent is used as a metaphor and has a connotation of whispering of (magic) spells.

The serpent was some sort of an intelligent being.

There are three possibilities:

• that this was an actual talking snake, such as Balaam's talking donkey (Num 22),

• or this was a pre-Adamic human bringing Oriental doctrines from the far East (another gospel),

• or this was Eve's own mind, which Paul feared might happen to Christians when he wrote 2Corinthians 11:3 “...lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted.”

Jeremiah 17:9 (Carnal Mind/Heart)

“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”

• Insight: The deceitfulness of the heart implies a subtle, crafty nature that can deceive even oneself.

Proverbs 16:25 (Misleading Reasoning)

“There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.”

• Insight: Highlights how our reasoning can mislead us, even when we believe we are right.

Romans 7:18-23 (War Within the Mind)

“For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.”

• Insight: Describes the internal conflict between the carnal mind and the desire to do good.

James 1:14-15 (Enticement by Own Lust)

“But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.”

• Insight: Emphasizes how our own desires and thoughts can lead to sin and betrayal.

Proverbs 28:26 (Folly of Trusting One’s Heart)

“He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.”

• Insight: Warns against trusting our own hearts due to their deceitful nature.

Romans 1:21-22 (Vain Imaginations)

“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

• Insight: Shows how vain thoughts can darken the heart and lead to self-deception.

1Corinthians 3:18 (Self-Deception in Wisdom)

“Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.”

• Insight: Warns against self-deception, particularly through worldly wisdom.

1John 1:8 (Deception of Self)

“If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.”

• Insight: Addresses self-deception about our own sinful nature.

James 1:22 (Hearing vs. Doing)

“But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.”

• Insight: Points out that merely hearing the Word without doing it leads to self-deception.

Isaiah 44:20 (A Deceived Heart)

“He feedeth on ashes: a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?”

• Insight: Describes how a deceived heart leads one to cling to falsehoods.

Hebrews 3:12-13 (Hardened by Sin’s Deceitfulness)

“Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.”

• Insight: Shows how sin’s deceitfulness can harden hearts and lead to self-betrayal.

Subtil is H6175 arum (adjective), meaning cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty, wise, shrewd, intelligent. Subtil is used 10 other times.

As I read these, put yourself in Eve's shoes.

Job 5:12 ​​ He (Yahweh) disappointeth the devices of the crafty (H6175), so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise.

Septuagint: frustrating the counsels of the crafty, and their hands shall not perform the truth:

• If Eve was reasoning within herself, thinking about whether the fruit was truly forbidden, this verse implies that God can disrupt deceptive self-reasoning before it leads to action.

Job 15:5 ​​ For thy mouth uttereth thine iniquity, and thou choosest the tongue of the crafty (H6175).

Septuagint: Thou art guilty by the words of thy mouth, neither hast thou discerned the words of the Mighty.

• If Eve’s own mind was leading her into iniquity, this verse reinforces that the serpent could be a metaphor for her crafty reasoning.

Proverbs 12:16 ​​ A fool's wrath is presently known: but a prudent (H6175) man covereth shame.

Septuagint: A fool declares his wrath the same day; but a prudent man hides his own disgrace.

Proverbs 12:23 ​​ A prudent (H6175) man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.

Septuagint: An understanding man is a throne of wisdom; but the heart of fools shall meet with curses.

Proverbs 13:16 ​​ Every prudent (H6175) man dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open his folly.

Septuagint: Every prudent man acts with knowledge: but the fool displays his own mischief.

Proverbs 14:8 ​​ The wisdom of the prudent (H6175) is to understand his way: but the folly of fools is deceit.

Septuagint: The wisdom of the prudent will understand their ways; but the folly of fools leads astray.

Proverbs 14:15 ​​ The simple believeth every word: but the prudent (H6175) man looketh well to his going.

Geneva: The foolish will beleeue euery thing: but the prudent will consider his steppes.

Proverbs 14:18 ​​ The simple inherit folly: but the prudent (H6175) are crowned with knowledge.

Proverbs 22:3/27:12 ​​ A prudent (H6175) man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.

Septuagint: An intelligent man seeing a bad man severely punished is himself instructed, but fools pass by and are punished.

Proverbs 12:16, 12:23, 13:16, 14:8, 14:15, 14:18, 22:3/27:12

• • In all these verses, the word arum is used positively to describe someone who is prudent, cautious, and knowledgeable.

  • This creates a contrast: was Eve’s reasoning (her inner "serpent") initially meant to be prudent, but instead it became twisted into self-justification?

  • Proverbs 14:15 ("The prudent man looks well to his going") directly applies—had Eve been truly prudent, she would have questioned her own desires and choices before acting.

The Scriptures2009 has 'CLEVER' instead of 'prudent' in all these verses.

A wise man, whose eyes are in his head, who looks about him and before him, and is cautious and careful of his conduct and behaviour; he foresees the evil of sin he is liable to be drawn into by such and such company, snares, and temptations; and therefore he keeps from them, and abstains from all appearance of evil, or what would lead him to it; and he foresees the evil of punishment, or the judgments of God that are coming on for sin; and he betakes himself to the Lord, to those hiding places and chambers of retreat and protection He has provided for His people, till the indignation be overpast; Isa_26:20; foolish persons, devoid of the grace of God and the fear of Him, go on careless and unconcerned in their sinful course of life, transgressing the law of God; they proceed from evil to evil, from lesser to greater sins; they go on in the broad road to destruction, and are punished with temporal judgments here, and with everlasting destruction hereafter. (Gill)

Theme and Meaning of 'Subtil' (H6175 – ‘aruwm) in Scripture

The Hebrew word H6175 – עָרוּם ('aruwm) is translated as "subtil," "crafty," or "prudent," depending on the context. This word holds a dual nature in Scripture, encompassing both positive and negative connotations:

• Positive Sense (Prudent, Wise, Discerning):

  • Refers to wisdom, foresight, and discretion.

  • Describes those who are thoughtful, cautious, and capable of making wise decisions.

  • Linked to understanding and the ability to conceal knowledge wisely.

• Negative Sense (Crafty, Deceptive, Sly):

  • Refers to cunning and deceitfulness used to mislead or harm others.

  • Describes those who employ slyness and manipulation for evil purposes.

  • Often used to depict adversaries, false teachers, and the carnal mind.

Common Themes and Symbolism in the Verses

Dual Nature of 'Subtil': Wisdom vs. Deception

• In Proverbs, 'aruwm' is depicted positively as prudence:

  • Prudent (H6175) Man: Thoughtful, discreet, and wise.

  • Fool: Rash, open about folly, and lacking discernment.

• In Job, 'aruwm' is depicted negatively as craftiness:

  • Crafty (H6175) Man: Deceptive, plotting, and manipulative.

  • Yahweh: Thwarts their schemes.

• Could this suggest that Eve’s reasoning (her inner serpent) started as wisdom but became distorted into rationalization and deception?

• This would align with how humans often justify their own actions through internal dialogue.

Connection to Eve’s Thought Process

• Eve was clever. She reasoned through the commandment, but her cleverness became self-deception.

• Instead of acting with true wisdom (like in Proverbs), she convinced herself that what was forbidden was actually desirable—justifying eating the fruit.

• This aligns with James 1:14-15, which describes how temptation works: "Each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin."

The 'Serpent' as Eve’s Own Mind

• The serpent’s "speech" could symbolize Eve’s own thoughts—her inner dialogue rationalizing the decision.

• She is not being deceived by an external being, but rather by her own cunning thoughts.

If she were being deceived by an external being, it would be one bringing 'another gospel'.

Final Thought: "CLEVER" and 'EVE'

• Note the word 'clever' contains 'EVE'—which is fascinating symbolically.

• This subtly reinforces the idea that the 'serpent' was Eve's own cleverness, her ability to reason, but in this case, her reasoning led her away from wisdom and toward self-deception.

Divine Justice vs. Human Deceit

• Job 5:12:

  Yahweh frustrates the plans of the crafty, showing that divine justice prevails over human deceit.

• Job 15:5:

  Craftiness is linked to self-deception and guilt.

• Symbolism:

  • God’s Sovereignty: He exposes and neutralizes deceit.

  • Crafty Humans: Symbolize the carnal mind opposing divine truth.

Foresight and Concealment vs. Folly and Exposure

• Proverbs 12:16, 12:23, 13:16, 14:8, 14:15, 14:18, 22:3 / 27:12:

  Prudent individuals demonstrate foresight, self-control, and discretion.
  Fools are rash, boastful, and exposed in their ignorance.

• Symbolism:

  • Prudent Man: Symbolizes a renewed mind led by wisdom.

  • Fool: Represents the carnal mind that exposes itself to judgment.

The Deceitfulness of the Carnal Mind

• Connection to Genesis 3:1:

  The serpent was "subtil" (H6175), symbolizing the carnal mind’s capacity for self-deception and rationalization of sin.

• Insight:

  • The carnal mind's craftiness leads to spiritual downfall.

  • Prudent discernment leads to protection from deception.

The Core Message of 'Subtil' (H6175)

• The word 'aruwm' (H6175) embodies the duality of human intellect:

  • Wisdom: Prudent foresight and cautious discretion.

  • Craftiness: Deceptive schemes and self-betrayal.

• God's Role:

  • Thwarts the crafty (Job 5:12).

  • Rewards the prudent with protection and knowledge (Prov 22:3).

• Key Message:

  • The true wisdom lies in prudent discernment rooted in godly understanding, while the carnal mind leads to deception and eventual exposure.

Genesis 3:2 ​​ And the woman said unto the serpent (H5175), We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

​​ 3:3 ​​ But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat (H398) of it, neither shall ye touch (H5060) it, lest ye die.

Eat is H398 akal (verb) and means to eat, devour.

Touch is H5060 naga (verb). It means to reach, lay the hand upon, it also means (euphemistically) to lie with a woman, figuratively “to acquire”.

What Does Strong’s H5060 (“nāgaʿ”) Really Mean?

Primary definition: to touch, reach, strike, affect, come near.

It has a broad range of uses, depending on context:

• Physical touch (Genesis 26:11 – “He that touches this man or his wife shall surely be put to death.”)

• Contact without harm (Genesis 32:25 – the angel “touched” Jacob’s thigh)

• Emotional or spiritual impact (Job 19:21 – “the hand of God hath touched me”)

• Even metaphorical hardship or affliction (Ruth 2:9 – “let none touch thee”)

Yes, in a few rare cases, it can euphemistically refer to sexual relations (e.g., Genesis 20:6), but only when the context clearly demands it (like God saying to Abimelech, “I withheld you from sinning with her”). That’s not the case in Genesis 3.

• There is no person or serpent being touched. The subject is “it”—the tree, not a person.

• No sexual context. There’s nothing in the grammar, structure, or surrounding verses that even hint at intimacy.

• This is Eve quoting God’s command, which included both eating and touching the tree. It’s a moral boundary, not a sensual one.

• If nāgaʿ in Genesis 3:3 means sex, then you’d also have to say people had sex with lepers (Lev 13:46), or that touching the Ark of the Covenant (2Sam 6:6) was sexual.

​​ 3:4 ​​ And the serpent (H5175) said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

2Corinthians 11:3-4 ​​ But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his villainy, so your minds should be corrupted from that sincerity and that purity which is with the Anointed (the people).

Verse 4 in 2Corinthians is a question.

4 For if indeed one coming proclaims another Jesus whom we did not proclaim, or you admit a different spirit which you have not received, or a different good message which you had not accepted, would you hold up well?

Galatians 1:7 ​​ Which is not another (good gospel); but there be some (false apostles) that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

1:8 ​​ But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

Eve's response to the serpent represents the mind engaging in dialogue with carnal reasoning.

• Carnal Mind’s Approach: Begins with a reasonable question to invite a rational discussion about God’s command, subtly sowing seeds of doubt.

Eve accurately recounts God’s command but adds “neither shall ye touch it,” suggesting that the carnal mind had already begun to distort and exaggerate divine instructions.

• Symbolism:

  • Overemphasis on restrictions reflects the carnal mind's tendency to misrepresent God’s intentions, making them seem more oppressive or unreasonable.

Romans 5:20; 7:5-8,11; 1Corinthians 15:56; Colossians 2:20-23: Overemphasis on restrictions (the law) stirred up sinful desires rather than restraining them. The law's purpose was to reveal sin.

• The commandment made sin more appealing and rebellious.

• The addition of the Levitical ordinances of the law highlighted and even increased awareness of sin, causing sin to abound more. (Gal 3:19)

• 1Corinthians 8:9-10 (Conscience and Legalism)

• Insight:

  • Legalistic restrictions can lead to confusion and rebellion when believers see others exercising freedom.

Proverbs 9:17 (Forbidden Desires)

“Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant.”

• Insight:

  • Forbidden things often become more desirable because they are restricted.

  • Overemphasis on prohibition can inflame the desire for the forbidden.

Ecclesiastes 7:16-17 (Over-Righteousness Leads to Ruin)

“Be not righteous over much; neither make thyself over wise: why shouldest thou destroy thyself? Be not over much wicked, neither be thou foolish: why shouldest thou die before thy time?”

• Insight:

  • Overemphasis on restrictive righteousness can lead to frustration and rebellion.

  • Suggesting a balance to avoid provoking rebellious reactions.

Matthew 23:4 (Pharisaic Legalism and Rebellion)

“For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.”

• Insight:

  • The Pharisees’ heavy restrictions led to hypocrisy and rebellion rather than true righteousness.

  • Excessive prohibitions can provoke resistance and resentment.

Galatians 5:1 (Liberty vs. Legalism)

“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”

• Insight:

  • Legalistic restrictions are seen as a yoke of bondage that can lead to rebellion rather than true freedom in Christ.

The serpent told Eve she would not 'surely die'.

Surely Die verses:

Old Testament References:

• Genesis 3:3, 4, 19 –

  • God warns Eve that eating from the tree of knowledge will result in death (Gen 3:3).

  • The serpent deceives her by saying, "You will not surely die" (Gen 3:4), introducing the first recorded lie.

  • After the fall, God pronounces judgment: humanity will return to dust, fulfilling the warning of death (Gen 3:19).

• Genesis 20:7 –

  • God warns Abimelech in a dream that if he does not return Sarah to Abraham, he will "surely die," showing divine justice and protection over His chosen people.

• Numbers 26:65 –

  • A reference to God's judgment on the rebellious generation in the wilderness, affirming that none of those who doubted Him would enter the Promised Land—they all died as foretold.

• Deuteronomy 27:26 –

  • Declares a curse upon anyone who does not uphold the law, reinforcing the principle that sin results in judgment.

• Ezekiel 3:18-20 –

  • God commands Ezekiel to warn the wicked; if he fails, their blood will be on his hands. However, if he warns them and they still refuse to repent, they will "surely die," emphasizing personal responsibility in righteousness.

• Ezekiel 18:4, 13, 32 –

  • "The soul that sinneth, it shall die" (Eze 18:4). God holds individuals accountable for their own sins.

  • Verse 13 condemns usury and unjust gain as sins leading to death.

  • Verse 32, however, shows God's mercy—He has no pleasure in the death of sinners and calls for repentance.

• Ezekiel 33:8, 14 –

  • Similar to Ezekiel 3, this passage emphasizes the duty of a watchman. If the wicked are not warned, they will die in their sins. If they repent, they will live.

New Testament References:

• Romans 1:32 –

  • Sinners, though aware of God's righteous judgment, not only commit sin but also encourage others, making them deserving of death.

• Romans 5:12-21 –

  • Sin entered the world through Adam, bringing eternal death upon all his household. However, Christ’s righteousness provides justification and eternal life.

• Romans 6:16, 23 –

  • Sin leads to death, but obedience to God leads to righteousness.

  • "The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ."

• Romans 7:10-13 –

  • The law, meant to bring life, instead condemns sinners because sin deceives and brings death.

• Romans 8:2 –

  • The "law of sin and death" is contrasted with the "law of the Spirit of life in Christ," showing that believers are freed from spiritual death.

• 1Corinthians 15:22, 56 –

  • "In Adam all die, in Christ all shall be made alive" (v.22).

  • "The sting of death is sin" (v.56), emphasizing that sin is the root cause of death, but victory comes through Jesus Christ.

• Galatians 3:10 –

  • Those who rely on the law are cursed because no one can fully keep it, making them subject to death. The Levitical ordinances expired, to continue in them is to deny The Christ.

• Ephesians 2:1-6 –

  • Humanity is spiritually dead in sin, but God makes believers alive through Jesus Christ.

• Ephesians 5:14 –

  • Calls sleeping sinners to "awake" and arise from spiritual death so that Christ may give them light.

• Colossians 2:13 –

  • Before salvation, believers were "dead in sins," but through Christ, they are made alive and forgiven.

• 1Timothy 5:6 –

  • A warning that a life of indulgence and lust leads to spiritual death, even while physically alive.

• James 1:15 –

  • Lust, when fully conceived, gives birth to sin, and sin brings forth death.

• 1John 5:16 –

  • A distinction is made between sins leading to death and sins that do not. This likely refers to unrepentant sin versus forgivable sin.

Revelation References:

• Revelation 2:11 –

  • Overcomers will not be hurt by the "second death," which is eternal separation from God.

• Revelation 20:6, 14 –

  • The second death (lake of fire) is the final judgment, but those in Christ will reign with Him and escape this fate.

• Revelation 21:8 –

  • Lists those destined for the second death (liars, murderers, idolaters, etc.), emphasizing eternal separation from God for the unrepentant.

Summary of Themes:

• Physical Death – Introduced through sin (Gen 3:19, Rom 5:12).

• Spiritual Death – Living in sin is equated with being spiritually dead (Eph 2:1, Col 2:13).

• Eternal Death – The "second death" is final judgment for unrepentant sinners (Rev 20:14, 21:8).

• Hope of Life – God calls sinners to repentance, offering life through Christ (Eze 18:32, Rom 6:23, Rev 2:11).

• No scapegoat or Devil to blame.

Surely die. Why? Because of the Devil? No, because of transgression of God's law.

The tree of knowledge of good and evil originated with God, not with Satan.

God planted the tree in the garden.

The tree therefore was something separate from Satan or the serpent so that when Eve partook of the tree she could do so without having any contact with a Satan or a serpent.

The fruit of the tree did open the eyes of both Adam and Eve. It did give them knowledge of good and evil, but it also did something which the Serpent said it would not do, and God said that it would. It did bring death.

Now what was the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?

Well, it is the only thing that it could be revealed in scores of passages in the Bible.

Deuteronomy 30:11 ​​ For this commandment (H4687- instruction) which I command (H6680- instruct) you this day, it is not hidden from (not to difficult for) you, neither is it far off.

30:12 ​​ It is not in heaven (sky), that you shouldest say, Who shall go up for us to heaven (the sky), and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it?

30:13 ​​ Neither is it beyond the sea, that you shouldest say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it?

30:14 ​​ But the word is very nigh unto you, in your mouth, and in your heart, that you mayest do it. ​​ (Rom 10:6-8)

What was set before the children of Israel by Moses?

Life and death, good and evil.

Deuteronomy 1:39 ​​ Moreover your little ones, which you said should be a prey, and your children, which in that day had no knowledge between good and evil, they shall go in thither, and unto them will I give it, and they shall possess it.

Why did not the little ones have knowledge of good and evil? Was it because they were not old enough to have sexual intercourse? No, it was because they had not been taught God's law, the knowledge of good and evil.

Deuteronomy 4:5 ​​ Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even as Yahweh my God commanded (H6680- instructed) me, that you should do so in the land whither you go to possess it.  ​​​​ (3Mac 3:3)

4:6 ​​ Keep (H8104- observe) therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations (other peoples), which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation (race) is a wise and understanding people.

What was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil but God's law? God's law is man's source of wisdom and knowledge. It is not Satan seducing Eve.

Hebrews 5:14 ​​ But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use (habit) have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

Isaiah 7:15 ​​ Butter and honey shall he eat (the common food for infants), that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.

• Butter and honey is the common food for infants, until he was grown up, or come to years of discretion, when he could distinguish between good and evil.

Psalm 51:6 ​​ Behold, You desirest truth in the inward parts: and in the hidden part You shalt make me to know wisdom.

• Meaning either Christ, the truth and the life, formed and dwelling in the hearts of His people; or the Gospel, the word of truth, which has a place there. The word rendered “inward parts,” means properly the reins, and is usually employed to denote the seat of the mind, the feelings, the intellect.

Psalm 111:10 ​​ The fear of Yahweh is the beginning of wisdom: a good (proper) understanding have all they that do His commandments: His praise endureth for ever.

Job 28:28 ​​ And unto man (Adam) He said, Behold, the fear of Yahweh, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.

Proverbs 1:7 ​​ The fear of Yahweh is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Proverbs 2:6 ​​ For Yahweh giveth wisdom: out of His mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.

What is the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden? It is God's law.

And by that tree came death.

Romans 7:9 ​​ For I was alive without (apart from) the law (Torah) once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.

'Died' refers to becoming aware. Paul understood the commandments and their results. He realized he was sinning. Sin killed him, not the law (Torah).

7:10 ​​ And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.

He realized he was sinning, and saw himself a dead man. Sin killed him, not the law (Torah).

7:11 ​​ For sin, taking occasion (a starting point) by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.  ​​​​ (Gen 3:13)

7:12 ​​ Wherefore the law (Torah) is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Man is not made alive by the law, but he is given the knowledge of good and evil, but the law slays him. The law of God is that which brings death upon man. God told Eve, “In the day that thou partakest of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, in that day, when you partake of My law, in that day you will begin to die.”

Romans 3:21 ​​ Is the law (Torah) then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law (Torah) given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law (Torah).

3:22 ​​ But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of (out of the belief of) Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

In other words, all are condemned to death by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, that tree being God's law.

Genesis 3:2-4 portrays the carnal mind (serpent) as employing a subtle, crafty form of deception that involves:

• Inviting Rational Debate:

  • Engages the mind in a seemingly innocent dialogue to reconsider God’s command.

• Distorting God’s Word:

  • Adds to and twists divine instructions to make them appear unreasonable.

• Minimizing Consequences:

  • Contradicts God’s warning to reduce the fear of sin’s consequences.

• Promoting Self-Justification:

  • Encourages reliance on personal judgment over divine authority.

The core message:
The carnal mind’s craftiness lies in its ability to rationalize disobedience by distorting the truth, minimizing consequences, and appealing to self-reliance and autonomy.

Genesis 3:13 ​​ And Yahweh God said unto the woman, What is this that you hast done? And the woman said, The serpent (H5175) beguiled me, and I did eat.

Beguiled is nasha, meaning, to lead astray, deceive, seduce.

• • The serpent symbolizes the carnal mind’s rationalization and deceitful reasoning.

  • Beguiled (deceived): Represents the carnal mind’s ability to distort truth and justify disobedience.

• Key Insight:

  • Eve’s admission reflects how the carnal mind’s logic can seem convincing but leads to spiritual downfall.

  • The mind’s rationalizations often shift blame or justify sin rather than accepting responsibility.

​​ 3:14 ​​ And Yahweh God said unto the serpent (H5175), Because you hast done this, you art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon your belly shalt you go, and dust shalt you eat all the days of your life:

“Upon thy belly shalt thou go”:

• • • Symbolizes the carnal mind’s subjection to base desires and earthly concerns.

    • Crawling on the belly: Suggests being bound to fleshly appetites and unable to rise to spiritual understanding.

  • “Dust shalt thou eat”:

    • Dust represents flesh (carnality) and mortality (Genesis 3:19).

    • Implies the carnal mind’s preoccupation with material, earthly things rather than the divine.

• Key Symbolism:

  • Curse on the carnal mind: Condemns it to earthly, fleshly pursuits without spiritual fulfillment.

  • Insatiable appetite for dust: Reflects how the carnal mind is never satisfied, always seeking more worldly things.

​​ 3:15 ​​ And I will put enmity (hatred) between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; it shall bruise (crush) your head, and you shalt bruise his heel.

• Enmity:

  • Represents the conflict between the carnal mind (serpent) and the spiritual mind (seed of the woman).

  • The ongoing struggle between fleshly desires and spiritual obedience.

• Thy seed (carnal-minded people) vs. her seed (spiritually-minded people):

  • Thy seed: Symbolizes those dominated by the carnal mind, pursuing self-interest and worldly desires.

  • Her seed: Represents those led by the Spirit, seeking righteousness and divine truth.

• Bruise thy head vs. bruise his heel:

  • Bruising the head: The overcoming the carnal mind’s authority and deceitful reasoning.

  • Bruising the heel: Implies the carnal mind’s attempts to hinder or cause stumbling to the spiritually-minded.

• Key Insight:

  • The head (authority and reason) of the carnal mind will be ultimately defeated by the spiritual seed.

  • The heel (the walk or path) of the spiritually-minded may be wounded temporarily, but not overcome.

There is a significant connection between the curse on the serpent (interpreted as the carnal mind) in Genesis 3:14-15 and the curses of Deuteronomy 28. This connection lies in the nature of the curses as consequences of following the carnal mind (symbolized by the serpent) instead of obedience to God’s commandments.

Genesis 3:14-15:

• • The curse on the serpent represents the carnal mind’s bondage to earthly desires and mortality as a result of disobedience.

  • Key Symbols:

    • Crawling on the belly: Subjection to fleshly desires.

    • Eating dust: A life bound to materialism and death.

    • Enmity with the seed of the woman: A continuous conflict between flesh and spirit.

    • (Isa 65:25; Rom 7:14-25, 8:6-8; 1Cor 15:47-49; James 3:14-15) These verses collectively support the interpretation that the curse on the serpent symbolizes the carnal mind’s enslavement to earthly desires and mortality as a result of disobedience, aligning with the broader Biblical themes of spiritual vs. carnal and life vs. death.

• Deuteronomy 28:15-68:

  • Describes curses for disobedience to God’s commandments, which result in spiritual, physical, and material consequences.

  • Key Symbols:

    • Curses on sustenance, health, and life: Reflects the serpent’s curse to eat dust (material concerns).

    • (Isa 29:4, 65:24; Mic 7:16-17; Ecc 3:20; Lam 3:16; Psa 72:9) These verses collectively demonstrate that the curses on sustenance, health, and life in Scripture align with the serpent's curse to eat dust, symbolizing a focus on material concerns, mortality, and earthly struggles resulting from disobedience.

    • Bondage and defeat: Parallel to the serpent’s subjection and the domination of the carnal mind.

    • (Isa 65:25; Mic 7:16-17; ​​ Psa 44:25; Rom 6:16-18, 7:23-24, 8:6-8; Col 5:17; Heb 2:14-15, 2Pet 2:19) These verses collectively support the idea that the bondage and defeat experienced by humanity due to sin is a parallel to the serpent's curse of subjection and the carnal mind's enslavement to earthly desires and mortality.

    • Separation from God’s blessing: Reflects the enmity described in Genesis 3:15.

    • (Gen 3:15; Rom 5:10; 8:7-8; Eph 2:12-13; Jas 4:4; Col 1:21-22; Isa 48:22; ​​ 59:1-2, 21; Matt 7:23; John 3:19-20) These verses collectively support the view that the enmity described in Genesis 3:15 symbolizes a spiritual separation from God’s blessing caused by sin and rebellion, which is ultimately restored through reconciliation with God.

Parallel Curses: Carnal Mind vs. Deuteronomy 28

There is a significant relationship between the enmity in Genesis 3:15 (interpreted as the conflict between the carnal mind and the spiritual Christ mindedness) and the Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13:3-23) and the Parable of the Wheat and Tares (Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43). This connection lies in the themes of:

• Enmity and Spiritual Conflict: The ongoing warfare between the carnal mind and the holy mind.

• Divine Sovereignty in Blinding and Revealing: God’s role in allowing delusion and blindness to the carnal-minded and understanding to the spiritually-minded.

• Separation and Judgment: The ultimate defeat of the carnal mind’s influence (the serpent’s head bruised) by the spiritual mind (Christ and His followers).

Enmity and Spiritual Conflict: Genesis 3:15 and the Parable of the Sower

Genesis 3:15: Enmity Between the Seeds

“And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”

• • Enmity: Represents the ongoing spiritual conflict between the carnal mind (serpent) and the spiritually-minded (seed of the woman).

  • Two Seeds:

    • Thy seed: Represents those dominated by the carnal mind (serpent).

    • Her seed: Represents those led by the Spirit (Christ and believers).

Parable of the Sower: Seeds and the Battle for Understanding (Matthew 13:3-9, 18-23)

“When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart…” (Matthew 13:19)

• • Seed on the Path: Represents those blinded by the carnal mind and unable to understand.

  • The Wicked One: Parallels the carnal mind (serpent) that snatches the word to prevent spiritual growth.

  • Good Ground: Represents the spiritual seed that receives and understands the word.

Key Parallel: Enmity Over Understanding

Divine Sovereignty: Blinding and Giving Understanding

God’s Role in Blinding: Isaiah 6:9-10 / Matthew 13:13-15

“Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive… lest at any time they should see… and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.”

• • God’s Sovereignty: Allows spiritual blindness to the carnal-minded while revealing truth to the spiritually-minded.

  • Connection to Genesis 3:15:

    • Blinding the carnal mind: Reflects the enmity between seeds – carnal mind vs. spiritual understanding.

God’s Role in Delusion: 2Thessalonians 2:11-12

“And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”

• • Delusion: Symbolizes the carnal mind’s susceptibility to deception due to its enmity against God.

  • Connection to Genesis 3:15:

    • Seed of the serpent: Represents those deceived by delusion due to their carnal nature.

Seeds that Grow into Wicked/Worldly/Selfish Fruits:

Galatians 6:7-8

“Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life.”

• Sowing to the flesh represents planting seeds of worldly desires and selfish actions, resulting in corruption.

James 3:14-16

“But if you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. This wisdom does not descend from above, but is earthly, sensual, demonic. For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.”

• Bitter envy and selfishness are seeds that grow into confusion and evil.

Matthew 13:24-30 (Parable of the Tares)

“The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way.”

• Tares represent wicked or false doctrines and actions sown by the enemy (human adversaries 'devils').

Hosea 10:13

“You have plowed wickedness; you have reaped iniquity. You have eaten the fruit of lies, because you trusted in your own way, in the multitude of your .”

• Plowing wickedness and trusting in self leads to reaping iniquity.

Proverbs 22:8

“He who sows iniquity will reap sorrow, and the rod of his anger will fail.”

• Sowing iniquity leads to sorrow and failure.

Matthew 7:16-17

“You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.”

• Bad trees (representing evil hearts and actions) bear bad fruit.

Isaiah 5:2, 4

“He dug it up and cleared out its stones, and planted it with the choicest vine. ... He expected it to bring forth good grapes, but it brought forth wild grapes.”

• Wild grapes symbolize corrupt actions despite receiving divine care.

Seeds that Grow into Righteous/Spiritually Christ-Minded Fruits:

Galatians 6:7-8 (also applies here)

“... but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life.”

• Sowing to the Spirit leads to everlasting life.

James 3:17-18

“But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. Now the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.”

• Seeds of peace and righteousness yield good fruits.

Matthew 13:23 (Parable of the Sower)

“But he who received seed on the good ground is he who hears the word and understands it, who indeed bears fruit and produces: some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.”

• Good ground represents a receptive heart that yields abundant spiritual fruit.

Colossians 1:10

“That you may walk worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing Him, being fruitful in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God.”

• Good works are fruit produced by sowing righteousness.

John 15:5, 8

“I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. ... By this My Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit; so you will be My disciples.”

• Abiding in Christ leads to bearing much fruit.

Philippians 1:11

“Being filled with the fruits of righteousness which are by Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.”

• Fruits of righteousness are the result of Christ-centered living.

Psalm 1:2-3

“But his delight is in the law of the Lord, and in His law he meditates day and night. He shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that brings forth its fruit in its season, whose leaf also shall not wither; and whatever he does shall prosper.”

• Meditation on God’s Word leads to fruitfulness and spiritual prosperity.

Hosea 10:12

“Sow for yourselves righteousness; reap in mercy; break up your fallow ground, for it is time to seek the Lord, till He comes and rains righteousness on you.”

• Sowing righteousness leads to reaping mercy and spiritual blessings.

Enmity and Ultimate Judgment

Parable of the Wheat and Tares (Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43)

“The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.” (Matthew 13:38)

• • Two Seeds: Reflects the enmity between the spiritually-minded (wheat) and the carnal-minded (tares).

  • The Wicked One: Sows tares (carnal-minded people) among the wheat, mirroring the enmity described in Genesis 3:15.

  • Harvest (Judgment): Symbolizes the ultimate defeat of the carnal mind’s seed (tares).

Key Parallel: Enmity and Separation

Common Themes of Enmity and Divine Sovereignty

The serpent in Genesis 3 symbolizes the carnal mind, which rationalizes sin, distorts truth, and justifies disobedience (2Cor 11:3, Rom 7:18-23). Eve’s dialogue reflects how human reasoning can lead to spiritual downfall.

The serpent’s curse—crawling on its belly and eating dust—represents the carnal mind’s bondage to worldly desires (Gen 3:14, Rom 8:6-8). The enmity between the serpent’s and the woman’s seed (Gen 3:15) symbolizes the struggle between fleshly reasoning and spiritual truth.

The key lesson: Our greatest adversary is not external, but the deceptive nature of our own minds.

Begin PART 2 of the Audio Presentation here  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 

Now, with all that in mind, let's examine the Tree of Life:

There was another tree in the garden called the Tree of Life, which God then prevented Adam from partaking of by driving Adam and Eve out of the garden of Eden.

Genesis 3:22 ​​ And Yahweh God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now (and at this time), lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

​​ 3:23 ​​ Therefore Yahweh God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

That Tree of Life is in...

Revelation 22:2 ​​ In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing (service) of the Nations.  ​​​​ (Gen 2:9; 2Esd 2:12, 7:123)

That tree of life is, of course, God's mercy upon us all through our true Redeemer, Jesus Christ. Those trees in the garden were not symbolic of men.

They were not symbolic of any act of men. They were symbolic of two things, God's law, which brings knowledge of good and evil, but brings death, and the tree of life, which is Jesus Christ, which will bring obedience to the law and everlasting life.

That by eating the forbidden fruit, man sought to gain knowledge but instead lost much of what he had. The phrase "as one of us" could refer to man's original state, made in God's image, now marred by sin, which he has now forfeited. (Gill)

Connections Between Genesis 3 and Luke 12:48:

Much Was Given, Much Was Lost:

• In Genesis 2-3, Adam and Eve were given dominion, innocence, direct fellowship with God, and the freedom to eat from every tree except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

• By disobeying God to gain knowledge, they forfeited their innocence, fellowship with God, and the ease of their dominion, losing much of what they were given.

• Luke 12:48 implies that those who have been entrusted with much will face greater accountability if they misuse what they’ve been given—which mirrors Adam and Eve’s fall.

Knowledge and Accountability:

• The forbidden fruit symbolized the desire for knowledge apart from God’s will, leading to greater accountability and judgment.

• Luke 12:48 emphasizes that with greater knowledge comes greater responsibility and potential for judgment, aligning with the increased accountability Adam and Eve faced after gaining knowledge of good and evil.

Stewardship and Loss:

• Adam's stewardship over Eden and his loss of that role parallels the principle in Luke 12:48—those entrusted with great responsibility face greater loss and consequence if they fail.

• The expulsion from Eden can be seen as a fulfillment of the principle that failing to steward what is given leads to greater consequences.

Desire for More Leading to Loss:

• Eve’s desire for the fruit was rooted in the promise of being like God, knowing good and evil (Gen 3:5).

• This mirrors the principle in Luke 12:48: seeking more than what one is rightly entrusted with leads to greater accountability and loss.

To quickly recap:

• What was the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?
  Answer: It represents God's law, which provides wisdom and understanding but also brings death due to sin (Deuteronomy 30:15, Hebrews 5:14).

• Why did the little ones not have knowledge of good and evil?
  Answer: It was because they had not been taught God's law, not because they were too young for physical intercourse (Deuteronomy 1:39).

• What is man's source of wisdom and knowledge?
  Answer: God's law, as seen in verses like Psalm 111:10 and Proverbs 2:6.

• How did Adam and Eve become as gods?
  Answer: By learning God's wisdom and law, as reflected in Genesis 3:22.

• What does the tree of life symbolize?
  Answer: It represents Jesus Christ and God's mercy, offering eternal life and healing through Him (John 6:51, Revelation 22:2).

• Why does God's law bring death?
  Answer: Though the law is holy, just, and good, it reveals sin and condemns man to death because of disobedience (Romans 7:9-12, Galatians 3:21-22).

Was the Genesis Serpent a Literal Snake?

Examining the biblical evidence suggests that the serpent in Genesis 3 could be an actual snake given speech by God:

• Numbers 22:21-31 recounts Balaam’s donkey speaking after God "opened the mouth of the ass." This precedent shows God’s ability to grant speech to animals for specific purposes.

• Interpreting the serpent as a literal snake avoids the speculative leap of equating it with a supernatural, fallen angel.

This is important to understand.

• Paul’s Warning in 2Corinthians 11:3:
  Paul warns against being beguiled like Eve, emphasizing that the seduction Satan performed was on the mind, not the body. The concern is about corruption of the mind from the simplicity in Christ.

The warning is, lest your minds should be corrupted. The pattern is the seducing of minds, not the seducing of bodies.

James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

2Peter 2:13-14 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

2:14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

So a man or woman can do to themselves that which Satan is said to have done, beguile, deceive, delude, or seduce his/her mind.

• Genesis 3 Context:
  The serpent in Genesis 3 is described as a subtle, cunning being (Hebrew: nachash). The word “serpent” is consistently translated from the Greek ophis, meaning "sharpness of vision," and is often used figuratively for a sly or cunning creature.

• Symbolism of the Serpent (Ophis) in the New Testament:

  • Matthew 7:10 and Luke 11:11: The term ophis is used to contrast harmful deception with God's goodness.

  • Matthew 10:16: Jesus advises His disciples to be "wise as serpents" (ophis) but harmless as doves, underscoring cunning without malevolence.

  • Matthew 23:33: Jesus calls Pharisees "serpents" (ophis), accusing them of deceptive and evil behavior.

  • Luke 10:19: Jesus gives His followers power over serpents (ophis), signifying authority over evil forces and false doctrines.

  • John 3:14: The serpent (ophis) Moses lifted in the wilderness is likened to Christ being lifted up, symbolizing healing and redemption.

  • Revelation 12:7-9: The great dragon, identified as Satan, is called “that old serpent” (ophis), who deceives the world.

• Deception as the Primary Theme:
  The Greek term G4105 planao, used in Revelation 12:9 to describe Satan deceiving the world, means to "cause to go astray," "seduce," or "deceive." This reinforces that the seduction in Genesis 3 was mental and spiritual, not physical.

The serpent (nachash/ophis) in Genesis 3 and throughout the Bible symbolizes cunning deception, primarily targeting the mind. Paul's warning in 2Corinthians 11:3 highlights this mental seduction, cautioning against being led astray from Christ's truth. Satan's role as the ultimate deceiver is reinforced in Revelation 12, where he is described as leading the whole world into error. The Biblical use of ophis consistently emphasizes spiritual deception rather than physical seduction.

Questions and Answers:

• What does the term “serpent” (nachash/ophis) signify?
  Answer: It represents cunning and subtlety, often used figuratively to describe deceptive, sly behavior (e.g., Satan in Genesis 3 and Revelation 12).

• Was Eve’s seduction physical or mental?
  Answer: The seduction was mental and spiritual, aimed at corrupting her mind, as seen in Paul's warning in 2Corinthians 11:3.

• How is ophis used in other parts of the Bible?
  Answer:

  • Ophis signifies sly wisdom in Matthew 10:16 ("wise as serpents").

  • It symbolizes deception in Matthew 23:33 (Pharisees as serpents).

  • In John 3:14, the serpent lifted by Moses prefigures Christ's redemptive role.

• Who is the serpent in Revelation 12?
  Answer: Satan is explicitly identified as the serpent (ophis), also called the dragon, the devil, and the deceiver of the whole world.

• What is Paul’s main concern in 2Corinthians 11:3?
  Answer: That Christians’ minds would be deceived and led astray from the simplicity in Christ, in the same way the 'serpent' deceived Eve.

The Trees in the Garden of Eden Are Not People:

• Genesis 2:8-9, 15-17:

  • God planted a garden in Eden, filled with trees pleasant to sight and good for food, including the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

  • Adam was commanded to eat from every tree except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, which would bring death upon eating its fruit.

• Biblical Symbolism of Trees as People or Nations: While trees in the Bible are sometimes symbolic of people or nations, not every instance of "trees" signifies peoples or groups. Examples include:

  • Isaiah 10:17-19: The Assyrian is symbolized as a forest of trees that is burned and diminished.

  • Jeremiah 11:16: Israel is called a green olive tree. Judah is called a fig tree.

  • Romans 11: Israelites are likened to wild olive branches grafted back into The Olive Tree.

  • Psalms 1:3; 92:12: Righteous individuals flourish like a tree planted by rivers or like a palm tree.

  • Isaiah 61:3: God's people in Zion are called "trees of righteousness."

  • Jude 12: Wicked men are compared to "trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots."

So we do have Bible passages where trees stand for individuals or for a group of people. In the Bible people are also called sheep, wolves, asses, dogs, lions, leopards, cattle and other animal names. Does that mean that all the animals in the Garden of Eden were actually people? No, it does not, no more than it means that the trees in Eden were people.

• Ezekiel 31:
  This chapter, frequently cited to suggest the trees in Eden were people, uses symbolic language to describe empires as trees:

  • Ezekiel 31:2-3: Assyria is likened to a cedar in Lebanon with tall branches and beauty.

  • Ezekiel 31:8-9: The trees of Eden envied the beauty of the Assyrian.

  • Ezekiel 31:16-18: God declares the downfall of Assyria, likening it to being cast down to the pit with the trees of Eden.

  Key Argument: While trees are used symbolically to describe empires or nations, the trees of Eden in Ezekiel 31 are not people; rather, they represent the greatness and beauty of the empires being compared.

• Symbolic Language Does Not Imply Literal Interpretation:

  • Trees and other objects (like animals) are often used symbolically throughout the Bible, but not every instance should be interpreted as representing people.

  • For example, in Matthew 13:31-32, Jesus compares the kingdom of heaven to a mustard seed that grows into a tree, which is clearly symbolic.

  • Similarly, the trees of Eden in Ezekiel 31 symbolize great nations or empires.

• Ezekiel 31 and Pharaoh:

  • God warns Pharaoh by referencing the downfall of Assyria, symbolized as a tree greater and more beautiful than the trees of Eden.

  • Ezekiel 31:18: Pharaoh is told he will also be brought low, like the trees of Eden, to the nether parts of the earth.
    Key Point: The trees in Eden are spoken of in the past tense in Ezekiel, indicating they no longer exist and were destroyed. This contradicts interpretations that they represent eternal beings or people.

Questions and Answers:

• Were the trees in Eden symbolic of people?
  Answer: No, the trees in Eden were literal trees, as described in Genesis 2:8-9. While trees are sometimes symbolic of people or nations in the Bible, this is not the case in Genesis 2.

• What is the significance of the trees of Eden in Ezekiel 31?
  Answer: The trees in Eden are used symbolically to represent beauty and greatness. Assyria, as an empire, is compared to these trees, but the trees themselves were not people.

• Why does Ezekiel 31 speak of the trees of Eden in the past tense?
  Answer: The trees of Eden are described as no longer existing, indicating they were destroyed. This supports the idea that these trees symbolize empires rather than people.

• Why does God use symbolic language for trees in Ezekiel 31?
  Answer: To emphasize the grandeur and subsequent downfall of Assyria, God compares its beauty to the trees in Eden, which were described as pleasant, good, and beautiful in Genesis 2:9.

• Does symbolic language about trees mean all references to trees signify people?
  Answer: No, symbolic language must be understood in its context. For example, while trees are used metaphorically for people or nations in Isaiah 61:3 or Romans 11, it does not mean all trees in the Bible represent people.

Genesis 3:4-7

• Genesis 3:4-7:

  • The serpent told Eve she would not die but that her eyes would be opened, and she would be like God, knowing good and evil.

  • Eve saw the tree as desirable for wisdom, ate its fruit, and gave it to Adam. Both then realized they were naked and sewed fig leaves for aprons.

• Interpretation of "Eyes Opened" and "Nakedness":

  • These terms do not imply physical or sexual acts but spiritual enlightenment and realization of sin.

  • Psalm 19:8: "The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes."

  • Psalm 119:18: "Open Thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of Thy law."

• • Psalm 146:8: "The Lord openeth the eyes of the blind."

Eve partook of the law of God. She saw it was good for food, and God's law is called bread, and it's called meat, and it's called food, and it's called even honey.

• Ezekiel 3:3 And He said unto me, Son of man, cause thy belly to eat, and fill thy bowels with this roll that I give thee. Then did I eat it; and it was in my mouth as honey for sweetness. ​​ (Psa 19:10, 119:103; Rev 10:9-10 sweet as honey)

• Understanding Nakedness:

  • Before eating from the tree, Adam and Eve were naked but not ashamed (Genesis 2:25).

  • After eating, they understood their nakedness as a lack of spiritual covering, realizing their mortality and sinfulness.

  • 2Corinthians 5:1-4: Paul speaks of a heavenly "house" or spiritual covering that prevents us from being found naked, symbolizing the need for righteousness.

• Spiritual Clothing:

  • Revelation 16:15: "Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame."

  • Revelation 3:5, 18: White raiment symbolizes the righteousness of the saints, covering shame.

  • Revelation 7:9, 13-14: Those clothed in white robes are those who washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb.

  • Revelation 19:6-8: Fine linen is the righteousness of saints, symbolizing salvation and the garment of salvation through Jesus Christ.

• God's Law and the Realization of Nakedness:

  • Reading and understanding God's law reveals sin and the need for salvation.

  • Isaiah 64:6: Our righteousness is as "filthy rags."

  • Genesis 3:21: God clothed Adam and Eve with animal skins, signifying atonement through the shedding of blood, a foreshadowing of Christ's sacrifice.

Questions and Answers:

• What does "eyes opened" mean?
  Answer: It refers to spiritual enlightenment through God's law, not a physical or sexual act. (Psalm 19:8; Psalm 119:18; Psalm 146:8).

• Why were Adam and Eve naked and ashamed after eating?
  Answer: Eating from the tree revealed their sinfulness and lack of spiritual covering, symbolizing their mortality and separation from God. (Genesis 2:25; 2Corinthians 5:1-4).

• What is the significance of the garments in Revelation?
  Answer: White garments symbolize salvation and righteousness through Christ, which covers spiritual nakedness. (Revelation 16:15; Revelation 3:5, 18; Revelation 19:6-8).

• What does the tree of knowledge of good and evil represent?
  Answer: It symbolizes God's law, which reveals sin and the need for righteousness.

• Why did God clothe Adam and Eve with animal skins?
  Answer: The animal skins symbolized atonement through the shedding of blood, foreshadowing the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus Christ to cover sin and provide righteousness. (Genesis 3:21).

• Did Satan cause Adam and Eve to recognize their nakedness?
  Answer: No. They realized their nakedness (spiritual condition) by partaking of the knowledge of good and evil, symbolizing God's law.

Adam and Eve's eyes were opened to their sin and mortality after eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which represents God's law. Their awareness of nakedness was a realization of their lack of righteousness and need for spiritual covering. God’s act of clothing them with animal skins prefigured Jesus Christ’s ultimate sacrifice, which provides the garment of salvation and covers our sins, enabling believers to stand before God.

Another rebuttal is: "But Gen. 2:25 says they were naked and NOT ashamed."

To which I would answer:

The Hebrew Words for “Naked” in Genesis

Genesis 2:25 – “They were both naked (H6174), the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.”

Hebrew Word: (H6174ʿārûm)

Meaning: This word generally means "nude, bare", emphasizing innocence, transparency, or vulnerability—but not necessarily shameful. It reflects their innocence and purity before sin entered.

Usage: Used rarely; one example is Job 1:21 — "Naked (ʿārûm) came I out of my mother's womb..."

Genesis 3:7, 3:10, 3:11 – “...they knew that they were naked (H5903)...”

Hebrew Word: (H5903ʿêrôm)

Meaning: This form emphasizes "exposure, shame, and guilt"—it’s a different root word, often associated with judgment, vulnerability due to sin, or loss of covering.

Usage: Used in places like Ezekiel 16:7, where it describes nakedness with shame or defilement.

What This Distinction Shows:

In Genesis 2:25, Adam and Eve were physically naked, yet unashamed—their spiritual condition was innocent.

In Genesis 3, after disobedience, they became aware of their spiritual nakedness (different Hebrew word), symbolizing guilt, loss of spiritual covering, and the awareness of sin.

The interpretation that "eyes opened" and "nakedness" refer to spiritual awakening to sin—not physical or sexual awareness—is linguistically valid and biblically sound.

Bonus Note: “Eyes Opened”

The phrase "eyes opened" in Hebrew (paqach, H6491) is also used in Isaiah 42:7 and Psalm 146:8 for spiritual understanding, not physical vision.

CAIN

The Birth of Cain and Abel (Genesis 4:1-2)

• The passage begins with Eve acknowledging Cain’s birth as an act of divine assistance (“I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord”).

• Cain’s name (Qayin) is etymologically linked to “acquisition” or “possession,” reflecting his mother’s perceived fulfillment, or at least a step towards God's promise in Genesis 3:15.

• Abel (Hevel) means “breath” or “vanity,” which foreshadows his fleeting existence.

Cain and Abel’s Offerings:

Genesis 4:3-7:

• Cain’s offering (produce from the field) was rejected, while Abel’s (animal sacrifice) was accepted.

• God told Cain that if he did well, he would be accepted, indicating Cain’s offering was rejected due to his own sin, not because he was the "son of Satan."

• Key Point: Cain rejected the idea of blood atonement, offering a bloodless sacrifice, which failed to align with God’s requirements.

• Heart attitude (Abel’s faith vs. Cain’s lack of devotion; Hebrews 11:4).

Leviticus 17:11:

• The ordinances of blood atonement and aligning with God's standards for atonement, a concept Cain apparently rejected.

Psalm 51:16-17:

• This passage emphasizes that God desires a contrite heart rather than the mere act of sacrifice. Cain’s offering lacked this heart of repentance and faith, which was central to Abel’s acceptance.

Proverbs 21:27:

• This proverb aligns with the idea that Cain’s heart attitude was the issue. Lack of faith and proper motive made his offering unacceptable.

Isaiah 1:11-15:

• In Isaiah, God rejects sacrifices not because of their form but because of the heart condition and disobedience of the offerers. This parallels Cain’s offering being rejected not merely because of what was offered but because of Cain’s sinful heart and lack of faith.

1John 3:11-12:

• Cain is described as being "of that wicked one" and having slain his brother because his works were evil, and Abel’s were righteous.

• Key Point: The passage attributes Cain’s actions to his own wickedness and does not blame Satan directly. "Of that wicked one" indicates Cain followed Satan’s ways, not that he was Satan’s literal offspring. Cain played the 'role' of an Adversary in opposition to God.

Jude 11:

• Cain is mentioned among the wicked who "ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward."

• Key Point: Cain’s rejection and wickedness are linked to his disobedience and sinful behavior, not a supposed satanic lineage.

Cain’s Anger and God’s Warning (Genesis 4:6-7)

• Cain becomes “very angry” and his face falls—a sign of inner turmoil and resentment.

• God warns Cain:

  • “If you do well, will you not be accepted?” → There is still an opportunity for redemption.

  • “Sin is crouching at the door; its desire is for you, but you must rule over it.” → Sin is personified as a predator, a force Cain must actively resist.

James 1:19-20 — Warning Against Anger

“Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God.”

This passage directly parallels the issue of Cain’s anger. James warns that human anger prevents a person from living righteously before God, much like Cain’s anger led to sinful actions. It supports God’s warning to Cain about mastering sin before it consumes him.

Romans 6:12-14 — Mastery Over Sin

“Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions. Do not present your members to sin as instruments for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life... For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace.”

Paul’s exhortation to not let sin reign parallels God’s warning to Cain: “you must rule over it.” Both passages emphasize that sin desires to dominate, but individuals have the responsibility and the ability to resist through submission to God.

1Peter 5:8-9 — Sin as a Predatory Force

“Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. Resist him, firm in your faith...”

The personification of sin as a predator crouching at the door in Genesis 4:7 is echoed here, with the devil depicted as a lion seeking to devour. Both passages emphasize vigilance and active resistance against this predatory force.

Ephesians 4:26-27 — Anger and Opportunity for Sin

“Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil.”

This warning aligns closely with God’s admonition to Cain. Anger itself is not condemned, but allowing it to fester opens the door for sin—much like Cain’s anger led him to murder Abel. The call to deal promptly with anger supports the idea of mastering sin before it leads to greater transgression.

Deuteronomy 30:19 — Choice Between Life and Death

“I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live.”

This verse parallels God’s implicit offer of redemption to Cain: “If you do well, will you not be accepted?” It emphasizes that individuals must choose between obedience (life) and sin (death), reinforcing the concept of moral responsibility and the freedom to choose rightly.

Psalm 19:13 — Dominion Over Sin

“Keep back your servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me! Then I shall be blameless, and innocent of great transgression.”

David’s prayer reflects the same concern as God’s warning to Cain: sin desires to rule. The plea to prevent sin from having dominion supports the instruction to “rule over it”(Genesis 4:7).

Galatians 5:16-17 — The Conflict Between Flesh and Spirit

“But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things you want to do.”

Paul’s description of the flesh’s desires opposing the Spirit parallels the idea of sin crouching at the door, desiring to control Cain. The call to walk by the Spirit aligns with God’s call to Cain to do well and resist sin.

Proverbs 4:23 — Guarding the Heart

“Keep your heart with all vigilance, for from it flow the springs of life.”

This verse underscores the need to guard one’s heart against sin’s influence, echoing God’s warning to Cain about mastering sin. The emphasis on vigilance and heart attitude ties back to the reason why Abel’s offering was accepted and Cain’s was not.

The Murder of Abel (Genesis 4:8-9)

Cain’s Actions and Their Implications:

• Cain lures Abel into the field and kills him, committing the first recorded act of homicide.

• God questions Cain: “Where is Abel your brother?”

• Cain’s infamous response: “Am I my brother’s keeper?” reveals his attempt to deflect responsibility.

Why Did Cain Slay Abel? (Genesis 4:10-12)

• • Answer: He killed Abel because his own works were evil, and his brother’s were righteous (1John 3:12). His actions were driven by envy and sin, not by Satan.

  • Parallel examples:

    Joseph and His Brothers (Genesis 37) — Envy and Betrayal

  • Cain: Killed Abel out of envy because Abel’s righteousness exposed his evil.

  • Joseph’s Brothers: Sold Joseph into slavery out of envy because of his favor with their father and his prophetic dreams. Both acts stemmed from jealousy and resulted in betrayal of a brother.

Esau and Jacob (Genesis 27) — Hatred and Murderous Intent

• • Cain: Acted out of anger and envy, leading to murder.

  • Esau: Sought to kill Jacob out of hatred and bitterness after losing his father’s blessing. Both involved a desire for revenge against a brother who was favored by God.

Moses and Korah (Numbers 16) — Rebellion Against Righteous Levitical Authority

• • Cain: Rejected God’s way and acted out of rebellion.

  • Korah: Led a rebellion against Moses’ authority, resenting God’s chosen leadership. Both rejected God’s way and faced divine judgment.

Saul and David (1Samuel 18-19) — Envy and Murderous Pursuit

• • Cain: Became angry when his offering was rejected and sought to kill Abel.

  • Saul: Was consumed by envy of David’s favor with God and repeatedly attempted to kill him. Both were driven by jealousy and a desire to eliminate the one who exposed their unrighteousness.

Absalom and Amnon (2Samuel 13:28) — Bloodshed Among Brothers

• • Cain: Committed murder out of rage and bitterness.

  • Absalom: Killed his brother Amnon out of hatred and vengeance for the assault on Tamar. Both murders involved premeditation and familial betrayal driven by strong emotions, reflecting the tragic consequences of sin within family lines.

The above examples demonstrate hatred between kinsmen.

Below are some examples of hatred between between non-kindred enemies.

Religious Leaders and Jesus (John 11) — Envy Leading to Murder

• • Cain: Murdered Abel because Abel’s righteousness exposed his evil.

  • Jewish Leaders: Plotted to kill Jesus out of envy because His righteousness exposed their hypocrisy. Both murders were acts of envy and a rejection of God’s chosen one.

Stephen and the Jewish Leaders (Acts 7) — Righteousness Exposing Evil

• • Cain: Murdered Abel because Abel’s righteous deeds exposed his evil.

  • Jewish Leaders: Stoned Stephen because his righteous testimony condemned them. Both acts involved silencing the righteous to hide their own evil.

Psalm 137:7 & Obadiah 1:10-14 — Betrayal and Destruction

• • Cain: Betrayed and murdered Abel out of envy and hatred.

  • Esau Edom: Betrayed Israel by assisting Babylon in destroying Jerusalem, plundering, and blocking escape routes.

  • Jacob Israel: Suffered destruction and betrayal by a kinsman, mirroring Abel’s innocent blood crying out for justice.

Ezekiel 25:12-14 & Amos 1:11-12 — Vengeance and Perpetual Hatred

• • Cain: Acted out of vengeful anger, leading to murder and exile.

  • Edom: Maintained perpetual hatred and took vengeance on Judah through bloodshed.

  • Israel: Endured ongoing violence from Edom, reflecting the ancient enmity of Cain’s wrath against Abel.

Ezekiel 35:5-10 & Micah 2:2 — Land Seizure and Covetousness

• • Cain: Desired dominion despite being cursed to wander.

  • Edom: Sought to seize Israel’s land during their calamity, coveting what was not theirs.

  • Israel: Faced land seizure and oppression, paralleling Abel’s loss due to Cain’s unrighteousness.

Joel 3:19 & Isaiah 34:5-8 — Bloodshed and Divine Judgment
Parallel:

• • Cain: Was cursed for shedding Abel’s innocent blood.

  • Edom: Was condemned for shedding innocent blood in Judah, facing God’s vengeance.

  • Israel: Witnessed divine justice against Edom, reflecting the curse on Cain for his brother’s blood.

Lamentations 4:21-22 & Jeremiah 49:7-22 — Gloating and Ultimate Judgment
Parallel:

• • Cain: Showed no remorse after killing Abel, displaying a cold indifference.

  • Edom: Rejoiced over Jerusalem’s fall, revealing their hatred for Israel.

  • Israel: Endured Edom’s gloating and was assured of Edom’s eventual judgment, echoing the curse upon Cain.

• • God declares that Abel’s blood cries out from the ground, establishing the principle of divine justice.

  • Cain is cursed from the ground—it will no longer yield to him. He is condemned to be a restless wanderer.

  • Unlike Adam and Eve’s punishment (toiling on the land), Cain’s punishment is alienation from the land itself.

Cain’s Marriage and Lineage:

• • Cain leaves the presence of God and settles in the land of Nod (“wandering"), symbolizing spiritual and physical displacement.

• • Cain took a wife from another land, not of his kind, further separating him from Adam’s line.

  • Seth replaced Cain as the inheritor of Adam’s lineage. This is why Cain is not listed in Adam's genealogies.

  • His actions disqualified him from continuing the righteous lineage meant to fulfill God’s promise of the seed in Genesis 3:15. As a result, Cain’s descendants are listed separately in Genesis 4:17-24, emphasizing their separation from the covenant line.

Parallel Disqualifications

Genesis 9:22-25 — Ham and Canaan

• • Sin: Ham’s dishonor of Noah.

  • Loss: Canaan (Ham's son) cursed to be a servant, losing his potential status and inheritance.

Genesis 25:29-34 — Esau

• • Sin: Despising his birthright for a meal.

  • Loss: Forfeited his birthright and the blessings of the covenant line to Jacob.

Reuben: The eldest of the 12 sons, lost birthright due to immorality (slept with his father's concubine).

• • Simeon and Levi: Lost inheritance due to violence.

  • 10 older Brothers: All lost birthright to Joseph’s line due to betrayal.

The similarity between the names in Cain’s lineage (Genesis 4:17-24) and Seth’s lineage (Genesis 5)

Deliberate Contrast: The Two Lines Represent Two Paths

• The similarities in names (like Enoch, Lamech, and Methushael/Methuselah) seem to be a deliberate literary device to contrast two distinct paths:

  • Cain’s line: Associated with worldliness, violence, and rebellion against God.

  • The 'way of Cain' (Jude 1:11)

  • Seth’s line: Associated with righteousness, calling on God’s name, and the covenant promise. Christianity is referred to as 'The Way' (Acts 9:2, 19:9,23, 22:4, 24:14,22)

• The duality emphasizes the biblical theme of two seeds or lineages: the seed of the serpent (Cain’s line) and the seed of the woman (Seth’s line) from Genesis 3:15.

Names and Meanings Reflect Different Characters and Destinies

• Though the names are similar, their meanings and contexts highlight different characters and destinies:

  • Enoch (Cain’s son): Associated with city-building (Genesis 4:17), indicating a focus on earthly achievements.

  • Enoch (Seth’s descendant): Known for walking with God, symbolizing righteousness and divine favor.

• Lamech (Cain’s line): Associated with violence and revenge (Genesis 4:23-24).

• Lamech (Seth’s line): Father of Noah, connected to rest and deliverance (Genesis 5:28-29).

• These contextual differences in actions and character underscore that these are distinct individuals despite having similar names.

Hebrew Linguistic and Cultural Practices: Name Repetition as a Theme

• In ancient Hebrew culture, name repetition was common to emphasize thematic contrasts or continuity:

  • The similar names may serve to highlight a moral and spiritual distinction between the unrighteous line of Cain and the righteous line of Seth.

• The practice of reusing or echoing names was also a way to reflect the ongoing struggle between good and evil in the biblical narrative.

Genealogical Purpose: Establishing the Messianic Line

• The genealogy in Genesis 5 through Seth is covenantal and messianic in nature, designed to trace the line leading to Noah, Abraham, and ultimately to Christ (Luke 3:23-38).

• In contrast, Cain’s genealogy in Genesis 4 seems to focus on the development of human civilization (cities, metallurgy, music) and the spread of corruption.

• Cain's lineage became known as Kenites H7017, meanings 'smiths'.

  • No relation to Jethro (Reuel) father in law of Moses. Moses' brother-in-law, Hobab is referred to as a Kenite in Judges 1:16 and as a Midianite in Numbers 10:29. These Kenite/Midianite in-laws of Moses are descendants of Abraham and Keturah.

• The purpose of listing Cain’s line appears to be to show the progression of sin and to set the stage for the flood narrative, making it clear that these are separate lines.

Theological Reason: Two Lineages, Two Destinies

• The similarities serve to emphasize the contrast between the unrighteous and the righteous:

  • Cain’s descendants: Symbolize those who reject God’s ways.

  • Seth’s descendants: Represent those who follow God’s covenant.

• This dual lineage motif appears throughout Scripture (e.g., Jacob and Esau, Ishmael and Isaac) to highlight the theme of election and divine purpose.

Summary of Key Differences:

• Character and Actions: Cain’s descendants are linked to violence and worldliness, while Seth’s are linked to righteousness and covenant faithfulness.

• Purpose of Lineages: Cain’s line emphasizes the spread of sin, while Seth’s emphasizes the continuation of the promise.

• Names as Literary Contrast: The similarities in names highlight the stark contrast in destinies and faithfulness to God.

So, the names may be similar to underscore the contrast between the two lines, but the contexts, actions, and purposes clearly distinguish them as separate family lines with different destinies.

Other Scriptural Examples:

• Potter and Clay: Romans 9:21-23 Different vessels for honorable and dishonorable use.

• Jacob and Esau: Genesis 25:23; Malachi 1:2-3 Divine election and different destinies from birth.

• Tares and Wheat: Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43 Coexistence until the harvest, followed by separation.

• Sheep and Goats: Matthew 25:31-46 Final separation of the righteous (sheep) and the wicked (goats).

• Net and Fish: Matthew 13:47-50 Sorting of good and bad fish at the end of the age.

• Honor and Dishonor: 2Timothy 2:20-21 Some vessels are for honor and others for dishonor in the house of God.

• Vine and Branches: John 15:1-6 Fruitful branches are kept, unfruitful branches are cast away.

• Righteous and Wicked: Psalm 1:3-6 The righteous flourish like a tree, the wicked perish like chaff.

• Good Figs and Bad Figs: Jeremiah 24:1-10 Good figs (those preserved by God) and bad figs (those destined for destruction).

These verses collectively emphasize the theme of different destinies based on righteousness, faithfulness, and God’s sovereign choice.

Summary of Themes that support FREE WILL:

• Choose Life or Death: Deuteronomy 30:19

• Serve the LORD or Other Gods: Joshua 24:15

• Obey or Disobey: Genesis 2:16-17

• Conditional Blessings: Isaiah 1:18-20

• Whosoever Will: Revelation 22:17

• Choice to Plan: Proverbs 16:9

• Following God’s Will: John 7:17

• Rejection of God’s Invitation: Matthew 23:37

• Sin by Choice: James 1:13-14

• Slavery to Righteousness or Sin: Romans 6:16

These verses collectively emphasize that humans have the ability to choose their actions, to obey or disobey God, and to accept or reject His invitations.

Theological and Philosophical Implications

Freedom and Consequence

• Cain’s pre-murder state mirrors humanity’s innate state of free will.

• Like modern philosophical conceptions of autonomy, Cain assumes he has total control over his fate, but he is not free from consequence.

• Similarly, humanity is “free” but still bound by sin, consequence, and divine justice.

• The parallel to Jesus Christ’s atonement is significant:

  • Without Christ, freedom would be meaningless because we would still bear the eternal consequence of sin.

  • Christ’s death frees humanity not from struggle but from condemnation.

The Role of Consciousness in Sin

• Cain’s lack of understanding before the murder parallels the ignorance of consequence.

• Abel’s death serves as Cain’s moment of revelation—only through sin does he gain full understanding of its gravity.

Sin as a Catalyst for Awareness

• The nature of law and morality is that wrong is always in contradiction to right.

• If there was no contrast between good and evil, consciousness would not exist in the same way.

• The greater truth (divine reality) exists independent of human nature; our awareness of sin deepens our understanding of right.

Parallel with Esau and Jacob (Romans 9:10-13):

• • Esau, like Cain, lost his birthright and later married Canaanite women. A grief to Isaac and Rebekah (Gen 26:35). Esau’s rejection was God’s sovereign choice, as explained in Romans, and was not due to any act or lineage. The Potter has power over the vessel. (Rom 9:21; Isa 64:8)

  • Key Point: Just as Esau was not rejected because of a different father, Cain’s rejection does not require him to be the son of Satan.

Esau Edom and World Events

Esau & Jacob: Two Nations in the Womb (Genesis 25:21-23)

• Genesis 25:21-23 describes Rebekah’s pregnancy with Esau and Jacob.

  • Yahweh tells her:

    "Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people, and the elder shall serve the younger."

  • Esau and Jacob are not just individuals, but two entire nations with conflicting destinies.

  • This struggle is not only physical but ideological, affecting law, government, religion, and world affairs.

Esau’s Birthright & Blessing (Genesis 27)

• Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of red pottage (Genesis 25:29-34).

• Later, Jacob received the blessing from Isaac (Genesis 27), further deepening Esau’s anger.

• Genesis 27:41 – "And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him; and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob."

• Key Takeaway:

  • Esau’s hatred and desire for revenge became a multi-generational conflict.

  • Esau's heart was wicked from birth. A vessel of dishonor (Romans 9).

  • His descendants (Edomites) inherited this hostility.

  • Esau and Jacob are a strong parallel to Cain and Abel.

Who Are Esau’s Descendants?

Does Esau Still Exist?

• Some theologians claim Esau was "wiped out" in history.

• However, Jewish sources confirm Esau’s descendants still exist:

  • 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia states: "Edom is in modern Jewry."

  • 1943 Jewish Encyclopedia (pg 474) The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.

  • 1935 Manifesto of the “World Jewish Federation,” spokesperson Gerald Soman: “Jews are a most unique and unusual people...because of their Edomite heritage. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman.”

  • Just as Israel (Jacob’s descendants) still exist (Anglo-Saxon), so do Esau’s descendants (Jews).

  • Understanding who they are today helps us interpret world events.

Esau’s Hatred & Revenge Against Jacob

• Throughout history, Edomites have conspired against Jacob’s descendants:

  • Obadiah 1:10-14 – Edom rejoiced over Jerusalem’s fall, assisting Babylon.

  • Psalm 137:7 – Edomites cheered for Jerusalem’s destruction: "Raise it, raise it, even to the foundation thereof!"

  • Ezekiel 35:5 – "Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel..."

  • Ezekiel 36:5 – “In the fire of My jealousy...and against all Idumea, which have appointed My land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds...”

• There are countless parallels to modern global conflicts, in which Esau's descendants still work against Jacob’s. Mainly in the realms of Governments, Corporations, Banks, Colleges, Hollywood and News Media, the Medical system, and practically every aspect of life. Esau's descendants are the sons of perdition, the symbolic 'man of sin'. The masses are ignorant of these things, for Esau works in secret, but in plain sight.

Esau’s Influence on Modern World Events

Esau’s Traits & Symbolism

• Esau’s name means "red" (Genesis 25:30).

• Red is associated with war, bloodshed, and revolution:

  • Revelation 6:4 – The "Red Horse" represents war.

  • Revelation 12:3 – The "Great Red Dragon" makes war on the saints.

  • Communist movements (Soviet Union, Marxism) are heavily associated with red symbolism.

Esau’s Role in Revolutions & Wars

• Historical conflicts involving mass bloodshed were influenced by Esau’s descendants:

  • French Revolution (Napoleon set them free, Red Shield banks rise)

  • Russian Bolshevik Revolution (Bolshevik Jews murder millions of Christians)

  • American Civil War (instigated by Jews Judah P. Benjamin and Albert Pike)

  • World War I & II (3-headed Eagle of IIEsdras- Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt)

• Quote from Marcus Eli Ravage (1928, Century Magazine):

  "We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, World War I, but of every other major revolution in your history."

  • Esau’s descendants manipulate wars and revolutions to weaken Jacob’s people. Divide and conquer. Ordo ab Chao.

Esau’s Control Over Banking & Government

• Genesis 27:40 – "By thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck."

• The Rothschild banking dynasty is cited as an example of Esau’s control (Rothschild = "Red Shield").

• Communist Manifesto (Karl Marx) promoted wealth redistribution and class struggle, which links to Esau’s methods of control.

  • The prophecy states that Esau will gain dominion for a time, but Jacob will ultimately prevail. Esau currently has the dominion.

God’s Judgment on Esau-Edom

The Prophecy of Edom’s Destruction

• Obadiah 1:18 – "The house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble..."

  • Esau’s descendants will be completely wiped out.

• Ezekiel 25:14 – "I will lay My vengeance upon Edom by the hand of My people Israel."

• Revelation 17-18 – The "Scarlet Beast" (Red Babylon) is destroyed.

  • Esau’s power is temporary.

  • God will judge and destroy Esau’s descendants for their wickedness.

The Rise of Jacob & Final Deliverance

• Obadiah 1:17 – "Upon Mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions."

• Jacob’s people will ultimately triumph over Esau and inherit the kingdom.

• Psalm 24:1 – "The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof, the world and they that dwell therein."

The contrasts between the Tree of Life, representing eternal life in Jesus Christ, with the Tree of Knowledge, which reveals sin and leads to death, reveals a parallel between Cain and Esau, who rejected God’s ways, lost what they had, and suffered exile, illustrating the struggle between obedience and rebellion. The key message is that true life and restoration come only through the faith of Jesus Christ, not in our own ways or self-righteousness.

Begin PART 3 of the Audio Presentation here  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 

The Serpent in the Old Testament

Genesis 49:17 ​​ Dan shall be a serpent (H5175) by the way, an adder (H8207 horned snake) in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.

Jacob’s Prophecy About Dan

In Genesis 49:16-17, Jacob prophesies that Dan will be "a serpent by the way, an adder in the path." Here, nachash symbolizes Dan’s subtle and potentially harmful influence. This metaphor shows that "serpent" does not necessarily denote a supernatural being.

Moses and the Serpent

• Exodus 4:1-4: God turns Moses' rod into a serpent (nachash) as a sign.

• Exodus 7:8-9: Aaron’s rod becomes a serpent (tanniyn), indicating a larger or different type of snake.
  These passages confirm that "serpent" can refer to literal snakes, used symbolically or miraculously by God.

Fiery Serpents in the Wilderness

• Numbers 21:6-9: God sends "fiery serpents" (nachash) among the Israelites. Moses crafts a bronze serpent for the people to look upon and be healed.
  This imagery of the serpent as both a cause of suffering and a symbol of deliverance recurs in scripture.

Other Uses of "Nachash" (H5175 serpent)

• 2Kings 18:4: The Israelites idolized the bronze serpent made by Moses, which Hezekiah later destroyed.

• Job 26:13: Refers to the "crooked serpent," a poetic allusion to the star constellation Hydra.

• Psalm 58:4; 140:3: The serpent represents poison or deceit, metaphorical for wickedness.

• Proverbs 23:29-35: Wine is likened to a biting serpent (nachash), symbolizing its destructive effects.

• Isaiah 27:1: The "piercing serpent" and "crooked serpent" (Leviathan) symbolize chaos and opposition to God.

Interpretations:

• Dan's Character and Tactics:

  • The imagery of a serpent or adder suggests that the tribe of Dan would employ subtlety and cunning, akin to the serpent's nature. This implies that Dan might achieve its objectives through strategic and unexpected means rather than direct confrontation.

• Military Implications:

  • The metaphor of biting the horse's heels, causing the rider to fall backward, is commonly interpreted as Dan's ability to strike powerful enemies in vulnerable spots, leading to their downfall. This reflects a form of guerrilla warfare or surprise attacks.

A few interpretations link this prophecy to specific historical events involving the tribe of Dan, such as their migration and actions described in the Book of Judges.

• Judges 18:27-29: Describes the tribe of Dan capturing the city of Laish through a surprise attack, exemplifying the cunning tactics alluded to in Genesis 49:17.

• Judges 13:2-5: Introduces Samson, a notable Danite, whose unconventional methods and strategic attacks against the Philistines reflect the serpent-like subtlety mentioned in the prophecy.

Genesis 49:17 portrays the tribe of Dan as embodying qualities of subtlety and cunning, akin to a serpent. This characteristic would enable Dan to achieve victories and influence outcomes through strategic and unexpected means.

The Tribe of Dan has been linked to various European regions, notably Denmark, based on historical, linguistic, and heraldic observations.

Denmark and the Tribe of Dan:

• Etymology: The name "Denmark" derives from "Dan," suggesting a lineage traceable to the Tribe of Dan. This theory posits that descendants of Dan migrated northward, influencing the naming of the region.

• Historical Accounts: Medieval chronicles, such as the "Chronicon Holsatiae vetus," and later antiquarians like Henry Spelman, have associated the Danes with the Israelite Tribe of Dan, citing similarities in nomenclature and cultural practices.

Heraldic Symbols:

• Denmark's Coat of Arms: The national emblem features three lions, a symbol also linked to the Tribe of Dan, as Jacob's blessing referred to Dan as a "lion's whelp." This lion imagery is prevalent in Danish heraldry.

• Serpent Imagery: Jacob's prophecy in Genesis 49:17 likens Dan to a serpent. While Denmark's heraldry prominently displays lions, the serpent symbol is less evident. However, serpent motifs have been identified in broader Scandinavian artifacts, potentially reflecting Danite influence.

Connections to Other European Regions:

• Place Names: The Tribe of Dan was known for naming locations after their ancestor, evident in biblical accounts like the city of Dan (Judges 18:29). This practice is mirrored in European toponyms such as the rivers Don, Dniester, Dnieper, and Danube, suggesting Danite migrations.

• Heraldic Emblems: Symbols associated with Dan, such as lions and serpents, appear in the heraldry of regions including Austria, the Czech Republic, Poland, and parts of Germany. For instance, the lion is a common motif in these areas, aligning with Dan's emblematic lion imagery.

Characteristics and Prophetic Implications:

• Seafaring Tradition: The Tribe of Dan had maritime associations, as indicated in the Song of Deborah (Judges 5:17). This aligns with the seafaring history of the Danes and other Scandinavian peoples.

• Idolatry and Omission in Revelation: Historically, Dan struggled with idolatry (Judges 18:30-31; 1Kings 12:28-30), leading to its omission from the tribes listed in Revelation 7:5-8.

• Some view this exclusion as a temporary judgment for apostasy, not a permanent loss of salvation.

Dan’s Destiny in Light of Prophecy

• Disciplinary Omission, Not Permanent: The absence of Dan in Revelation appears to be a temporary disciplinary action rather than a sign of eternal rejection.

• Inclusion in Ezekiel: The restoration of Dan in Ezekiel 48 supports the view that all tribes, including Dan, will partake in the salvation of Israel.

• “All Israel Shall Be Saved”: Romans 11:26 suggests that God’s promise encompasses all tribes, indicating that Dan will ultimately be included in the fulfillment of this prophecy.

Job 26:13 ​​ By His spirit He hath garnished the heavens; His hand hath formed the crooked serpent (H5175)(the constellation Hydra).

Septuagint: 13 ​​ And the barriers of heaven fear Him, and by a command He has slain the apostate dragon.

Job refers here to one of the constellations, which it seems was then known as the serpent or dragon. The practice of forming pictures of the heavens, with a somewhat fanciful resemblance to animals, was one of the most early devices of astronomy, and was evidently known in the time of Job. The figure of the Serpent, or “the Dragon,” is still one of the constellations of the heavens. (Barnes)

Isaiah 27:1 ​​ In that day Yahweh with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.

'Leviathan' -mystically earthly princes and potentates, for their great power and authority, their cruelty and voraciousness, their craft and cunning.

In Psalm 74 'leviathan' seems to be applied to Pharaoh. The crocodile is intended, its natural inhabitant of the Nile. Thus, in Ezekiel 29:3-5, the dragon, or crocodile of the Nile, represents Pharaoh: Ezekiel 22:2 Pharaoh is compared to a whale in the seas; in Psalm 74:13-14, Pharaoh is compared to the dragon and leviathan. In Revelation Rome, the new Babylon, is compared to a great red dragon. (Gill)

In Exodus 4:1-4, Moses expresses doubt that the Israelites will believe God has appeared to him. In response, God provides signs to authenticate Moses' divine commission.

Exodus 4:1 ​​ And Moses answered and said, But, behold, they will not believe me, nor hearken unto my voice: for they will say, Yahweh hath not appeared unto you.

​​ 4:2 ​​ And Yahweh said unto him, What is that in your hand? And he said, A rod.

​​ 4:3 ​​ And He said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent (H5175) (Divine); and Moses fled from before it.

The transformation of Moses' staff into a serpent can be understood as a demonstration of God's supremacy over Egyptian symbols of power, reinforcing Moses' divine commission.

​​ 4:4 ​​ And Yahweh said unto Moses, Put forth your hand, and take it by the tail. And he put forth his hand, and caught it, and it became a rod in his hand:

This demonstrates Moses’ faith in God. God tells Moses that the purpose of this miracle was so that the Israelites will know without a doubt that the God of the patriarchs had in fact spoken to Moses. Interestingly, in Egypt, the snake symbolized power and life. Thus, God was telling Moses that he would overcome the power of Egypt with His omnipotence. This miracle demonstrated to Moses that the God of Abraham had control over the animal kingdom. Now, this first miracle like the two to follow are all designed to convince Moses to have faith in God’s ability to give him the capacity to carry out the commission that God bestowed upon him. With these miracles, God is saying to Moses that “you can trust Me and if I can do these miracles, then I certainly can give you the power to perform the task I have assigned to you.” At this point in his life, Moses does not know the character and nature of God. These three miracles are designed to teach Moses that the Person he is speaking to is in fact the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Bill Wenstrom)

This event prefigures later biblical narratives where serpents play pivotal roles, such as the bronze serpent in Numbers 21, which God used as a means to heal the Israelites.

The serpent in Exodus 4:3 serves as a multifaceted symbol, representing God's authority over earthly powers, His ability to perform miracles, and His overarching plan for the salvation of His people.

The need for interpretive decisions in translation extends to widely used English versions of the Bible. While modern translations aim for accessibility, their editorial decisions sometimes alter the meaning of the original text. For example, in Exodus 4:16 and Exodus 7:1, the English translations add prepositions to modify the meaning of the Hebrew text, subtly shifting how Moses’ role in relation to Pharaoh and Aaron is understood.

• Exodus 4:16 states that Aaron will be Moses’ mouthpiece, and Moses will be to Aaron as God (Elohim). The Hebrew phrase uses a lamed preposition, which is typically translated as "to" or "for," rather than "like" or "as."

• Exodus 7:1 states that Yahweh makes Moses Elohim to Pharaoh, without an explicit comparative preposition. However, many English translations introduce the word "like" to soften the apparent theological implication that Moses is being directly referred to as God.

By inserting these comparative prepositions, translators impose a particular interpretation that limits the reader’s understanding of how Moses functions within the narrative.

Other Verses Using the Same Hebrew Words

• Exodus 22:8–9: Judges are referred to as Elohim in a legal context:
  “The case of both parties shall come before God (Elohim); the one whom God (Elohim) condemns shall pay double to his neighbor.”

  • Here, Elohim clearly refers to human judges acting with divine authority. This supports the view that Moses, acting as Elohim, is more than just a prophet; he is a divinely appointed judge and ruler in the theocratic sense.

• Psalm 82:6:
  “I said, ‘You are gods (Elohim), sons of the Most High, all of you.’”

  • This verse reflects the use of Elohim for people with divine authority or role, which aligns with the portrayal of Moses as Elohim to Pharaoh.

Understanding the Moses-Pharaoh Dynamic

The metaphor of Moses as Elohim to Pharaoh carries deeper implications within the Exodus narrative. Scholars who interpret the phrase as a simple simile argue that Moses functions like a god without actually being divine. However, closer analysis of the Hebrew grammar suggests that Moses is not merely acting like a god but is appointed to fulfill a divine role in his interactions with Pharaoh.

Notably, Yahweh never speaks directly to Pharaoh in the biblical narrative. This absence is significant because, in other instances, Yahweh does communicate directly with foreign rulers (e.g., Abimelech in Genesis 20 and Cyrus in 2Chronicles 36)(God does not speak directly to this Pharaoh likely because the Pharaoh at this time was a Hyksos Canaanite. A foreign non-kinsman to Israel). Instead, Moses alone conveys Yahweh’s messages and wields supernatural power through miracles. This suggests that in his dealings with Pharaoh, Moses functions as a representational deity—a quasi-deity endowed with divine authority.

Quasi is an adjective = having a likeness or resemblance.

Pharaohs in the ancient Near East were often regarded as gods, ruling with divine authority. However, the Exodus narrative subverts this notion by presenting Moses, an exiled Hebrew shepherd, as a true divine agent, overshadowing Pharaoh’s supposed godhood. This ironic role-reversal is emphasized in their confrontations, particularly in the first plague narrative, where Moses, as Yahweh’s appointed Elohim, challenges Pharaoh’s authority.

The escalating nature of the plagues further underscores Moses’ divine function. Initially, Aaron performs miracles at Moses’ command, mirroring the divine-prophet relationship. However, as the plagues progress, Moses himself directly enacts Yahweh’s will, reinforcing his quasi-divine status. His words and actions become indistinguishable from Yahweh’s divine authority.

The metaphor of Moses as Elohim to Pharaoh and Aaron is not merely a poetic flourish but a fundamental characterization of Moses’ role in Exodus. English translations, by modifying the Hebrew syntax, sometimes obscure the original metaphor’s depth, reducing Moses to a mere prophetic figure.

Exodus 4:16 and 7:1, the text says Moses will be “Elohim to Pharaoh.” This isn’t saying Moses is God, but that he will stand in God's place—as His appointed representative with divine authority. In fact, the word “Elohim” is used in scripture not only for God but also for judges and rulers acting on His behalf (as in Psalm 82:6 and Exodus 22:8–9). So Moses functions as a quasi-deity—a human vested with divine authority to judge and speak for Yahweh.

Moses being Elohim to Pharaoh shows he was more than a prophet—he was a living embodiment of God’s authority in that moment.

Moses was a human agent commissioned by God—filled with His Spirit, entrusted with His authority, and symbolic of God’s presence and justice. We will see later that this fits the framework for Michael as a metaphoric figure of divine leadership perfectly.

Exodus 7:8 ​​ And Yahweh spake unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying,

​​ 7:9 ​​ When Pharaoh shall speak unto you, saying, Shew a miracle for you: then you shalt say unto Aaron, Take your rod, and cast it before Pharaoh, and it shall become a serpent (H8577 tanniyn).

In this case, 'serpent' is a different Hebrew word: “tanniyn” (tan-neen), which means more specifically, a sea serpent or a land serpent. The Hebrew has crocodile where the KJV has serpent. The crocodile was a mystical symbol of Egypt and the power symbol for Pharaoh.

The word 'tanniyn' appears in various contexts throughout the Hebrew Bible, often translated as "serpent," "dragon," or "sea monster." Its usage encompasses:

• Sea or River Creatures: In Genesis 1:21, 'tanniyn' refers to large sea creatures created by God.

• Metaphorical Beings: In passages like Isaiah 27:1, Leviathan is a metaphor or symbol for oppressive world powers such as Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon.

Biblical Consistency:

In other Scriptures, the sea and its creatures often symbolize chaos, nations, and political powers:

• • Ezekiel 29:3: Describes Pharaoh as a great dragon (tanniyn) in the Nile.

  • Revelation 13: The beast from the sea symbolizes a political power opposed to God.

• Land Reptiles: Some verses, such as Deuteronomy 32:33 and Psalm 91:13, use 'tanniyn' to describe venomous serpents or land-based reptiles.

Exodus 7:15 ​​ Get thee unto Pharaoh in the morning; lo, he goeth out unto the water; and thou shalt stand by the river's brink against he come; and the rod which was turned to a serpent (H5175- Divine) shalt thou take in thine hand.

Exodus 7:15 highlights a pivotal moment where Moses, under God's direction, confronts Pharaoh in a setting laden with religious and cultural significance, setting the stage for the ensuing demonstrations of divine authority over Egypt.

WITCHCRAFT

The multiple forms of witchcraft are declared by the Bible as being contrary to God's Word and will, and they are specifically defined as rebellion against God.

Exodus 22:18 ​​ You shalt not suffer a witch (sorcerer) to live.

Deuteronomy 18:10 ​​ There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,

18:11 ​​ Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

1Samuel 15:23 For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry.

Nahum 3:4 Because of the multitude of the whoredoms of the wellfavoured harlot, the mistress of witchcrafts, that selleth nations through her whoredoms, and families through her witchcrafts.

3:5 ​​ Behold, I am against thee, saith the LORD of hosts

Galatians 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,... that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

These passages along with (Lev 19:31; Mic 5:12; Rev 18:23) underscore the severity with which such practices are viewed, often equating them with idolatry and moral corruption.

Believing in lying wonders is against the Kingdom of God since acting upon these influences defiles people and the Kingdom. The word “witch” comes from the concept, “to twist”, “to turn”, and “to rebel” having a differing set of laws which are man-made. Even religious persons in “Christian” churches who claim the Ten Commandments, the Statutes and Judgements of the Law of God’s Kingdom no longer apply to the redeemed, likewise are in the witch category because they keep these things covered up, they 'twist' the Word to suit their denominational beliefs, they 'turn' the true Word upside down, and by their antinomianism they are 'rebels', and thus are in darkness and apostasy.

The SCAPEGOAT

The concept of the scapegoat is central to understanding how blame is often misdirected, particularly in relation to the devil or Satan as depicted in the Bible.

Leviticus 16 outlines the ordinance of the scapegoat:

• A goat (saiyr)(saw-eer') was symbolically burdened with Israel’s sins and then sent into the wilderness, symbolizing the removal of sin.

• The term saiyr used for "scapegoat" is the same word translated as "devils" in other passages. This suggests that the scapegoat was seen as a figurative bearer of sin, not a literal being with agency.

• Some scholars propose that "Azazel" derives from combining the Hebrew words for "goat" (ez) and "to go away" (azal), rendering it as "the goat that departs." This aligns with the scapegoat's role in symbolically carrying away the sins of the people.

Yahweh gives Moses instructions for Aaron his brother the high priest regarding the Day of Atonement for the sins of the nation.

Leviticus 16:8 ​​ And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats; one lot for Yahweh, and the other lot for the scapegoat.

Azazel (H5799), goat of departure. Also the name of a desert demon (Book of Enoch) to whom sin was imputed. But it was Jesus to whom our sins were imputed.

1John 2:2 ​​ And He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world (society).

Symbolism of the Two Goats

• Dual Aspects of Atonement: The ritual involving two goats on the Day of Atonement encapsulates a profound theological message. The first goat, sacrificed as a sin offering, signifies the necessity of bloodshed for the remission of sins, highlighting the gravity of transgression. The second goat, the scapegoat, symbolizes the complete removal of sin from the community, illustrating the restoration of purity and the people's reconciliation with God.

This prefigures Jesus Christ, who bore our iniquities and removed them.

​​ 16:9 ​​ And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which Yahweh's lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering.

​​ 16:10 ​​ But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat (H5799) (Azazel), shall be presented alive before Yahweh, to make an atonement (propitiation) with Him, and to let him go for a scapegoat (H5799) (Azazel) into the wilderness.

​​ 16:21 ​​ And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:

​​ 16:22 ​​ And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness.

Again, Jesus bore our sins, not some desert demon named Azazel. This is all symbolic.

Isaiah 53:11 ​​ He shall see of the travail of His soul, and shall be satisfied: by His knowledge shall My righteous servant justify many; for He shall bear their iniquities.

John 1:29 ​​ The next day John seeth Jesus (not Azazel) coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

​​ 16:26 ​​ And he that let go the goat for the scapegoat (H5799) (Azazel) shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward come into the camp.

False Scapegoats in Human Behavior

The scapegoat imagery parallels modern tendencies to externalize guilt:

• People often claim, "The devil made me do it," shifting responsibility for their sins to an external source.

• This mirrors Israel's worship of idols (or "devils") as scapegoats for their failings. God consistently condemned this behavior, holding individuals accountable for their actions.

The concept of the devil as a supernatural being contradicts the Old Testament’s portrayal of idols, adversaries, and human responsibility:

• Idols (saiyr) are powerless constructs, falsely blamed for human failings.

• The scapegoat symbolizes humanity’s attempt to externalize guilt rather than acknowledge personal responsibility.

• True biblical teaching emphasizes God’s sovereignty and humanity’s accountability, dismantling the myth of a supernatural devil.

The scapegoat ritual, while symbolically removing sin, also serves as a poignant reminder of individual and communal responsibility. It underscores that sin originates within the community and must be acknowledged and confessed before it can be removed. This counters the inclination to externalize blame onto entities like the devil, emphasizing that true repentance and atonement require personal accountability.

The account in Numbers 21:6-9 describes a pivotal moment during Israel's wilderness journey, where the people's rebellion led to divine judgment through "fiery serpents." This incident not only underscores themes of sin and repentance but also serves as a profound typological foreshadowing of Jesus Christ's redemptive work.

Numbers 21:6 ​​ And Yahweh sent fiery (H8314) (poisonous, burning) serpents (H5175) among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.

Fiery is saraph, meaning poisonous serpent (fiery from the burning effect of the poison).

1Corinthians 10:9 ​​ Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents.

​​ 21:7 ​​ Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against Yahweh, and against you; pray unto Yahweh, that He take away the serpents (H5175) from us. And Moses prayed for the people.

​​ 21:8 ​​ And Yahweh said unto Moses, Make you a fiery serpent (H8314) (seraphiym- poisonous serpent), and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live.

​​ 21:9 ​​ And Moses made a serpent (H5175- image) of brass (bronze), and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent (H5175) had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent (H5175 image) of brass (bronze), he lived.

John 3:14 ​​ And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

2Kings 18:4 ​​ He (Hezekiah) removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.

Lessons and Reflections

• Consequences of Disobedience: The fiery serpents were a direct consequence of Israel's rebellion, highlighting the seriousness of sin.

• Provision of Mercy: Despite their transgressions, God provided a means of healing, illustrating His readiness to forgive upon genuine repentance.

• Faith and Obedience: The act of looking upon the bronze serpent required faith in God's promise and obedience to His instruction, paralleling the faith required for salvation through Jesus Christ.

This narrative encapsulates the interplay between judgment and mercy, the dangers of idolatry, and the profound foreshadowing of Jesus Christ's redemptive work

Here, in the Old Testament, devils are made synonymous with idols. They are something one worships which is not of God.

God repeatedly emphasizes the futility of idols:

Deuteronomy 32:36 ​​ “For יהוה rightly rules His people And has compassion on His servants, When He sees that their power is gone, And there is no one remaining, Shut up or at large.

​​ 32:37 ​​ “And He shall say, ‘Where are their mighty ones (gods), The rock in whom they sought refuge?

​​ 32:38 ​​ Who ate the fat of their slaughterings, And drank the wine of their drink offering? Let them arise and help you, Let it be a hiding-place for you!

​​ 32:39 ​​ See now that I, I am He, And there is no Elohim besides Me. I put to death and I make alive. I have wounded, and I heal. And from My hand no one delivers!

​​ 32:40 ​​ For I lift My hand to the heavens, And shall say: As I live forever,

​​ 32:41 ​​ If I have sharpened My flashing sword, And My hand takes hold on judgment, I shall return vengeance to My enemies, And repay those who hate Me.

This passage underscores the futility of idol worship, contrasting these powerless entities with God, the true "Rock" of Israel. The term "their rock" refers to the false gods made of wood and stone, emphasizing their lifelessness compared to the living God.

The association between idols and demons is further elaborated in Deuteronomy 32:17:

"They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not."

Here, the term "devils" (H7700 shedim) is used synonymously with idols, indicating that the Israelites' worship of these entities was, in essence, a sacrifice to demons. This connection is reinforced in Psalm 106:37:

"Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils.”

The term shedim appears only in these two instances in the Old Testament and is often translated as "demons." In ancient Near Eastern cultures, shedim were considered spirits or demons associated with foreign deities. The Israelites' adoption of such practices represented a profound departure from their covenant with God.

The New Testament echoes this understanding. In 1Corinthians 10:20, Paul warns:

"But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God."

This continuity underscores the biblical stance that idol worship equates to reverence of demonic entities, highlighting the spiritual peril of turning away from God to serve lifeless idols.

In 2Kings 18:4, King Hezekiah initiated significant religious reforms to restore proper worship practices among the Israelites, one of them was destroying the bronze serpent because, though it was preserved as a memorial the people still believed it contained life and was an object of worship to them.

2Kings 18:4 ​​ He removed the high places, and brake the images (sacred pillars), and cut down the groves (Asherah poles), and brake in pieces the brasen serpent (H5175- image) that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan (a thing of bronze).

Key Elements of Hezekiah's Reforms:

• Removal of High Places: These were unauthorized worship sites often associated with idol worship. By eliminating them, Hezekiah sought to centralize worship in Jerusalem, aligning with Deuteronomic law.

• Destruction of Sacred Pillars: These stone monuments were linked to Canaanite religious practices. Their removal was part of purging pagan influences.

• Cutting Down Asherah Poles: Asherah poles were wooden symbols representing the Canaanite goddess Asherah, often placed near altars. Their eradication was crucial in eliminating idolatrous practices.

• Breaking the Bronze Serpent (Nehushtan): Originally crafted by Moses as a means for healing (Numbers 21:9), it had become an object of idolatrous worship over time. Hezekiah destroyed it to prevent its misuse.

Psalm 58:3-5 portrays the inherent wickedness of certain individuals, comparing their deceitful nature to the venom of serpents that refuse to heed the voice of charmers. This metaphor emphasizes their deliberate choice to reject guidance and persist in harmful behavior.

Psalm 58:3 ​​ The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.

​​ 58:4 ​​ Their poison (rage, anger, wrath) is like the poison (rage, anger, wrath) of a serpent (H5175): they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;

​​ 58:5 ​​ Which will not hearken to the voice of charmers, charming never so wisely.

Poison of the Serpent: Symbol of Deception and Harm

• Poison represents the harmful words, deceitful doctrines, and corrupt policies spread by political and religious leaders who oppose God’s truth.

• Like the venom of a serpent, these words can be subtle yet deadly, infiltrating and corrupting the beliefs and actions of the people.

Example:

• • Pharisees and Sadducees in Jesus' time (Matthew 23:33):

    “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?”

    • Here, Jesus likens the religious leaders’ false teachings and hypocrisy to the poison of serpents, highlighting their cunning and deadly influence.

Deaf is H2795 cheresh, meaning deaf (whether literal or spiritual). Related to H2790 charash, figuratively to devise (in a bad sense); hence (from the idea of secrecy) to be silent, to let alone.

Ear is H241, ozen, (subjective) to uncover the ear to reveal; the receiver of divine revelation.

The Deaf Adder: A Willful Refusal to Hear Truth

• The deaf adder that “stoppeth her ear” symbolizes a deliberate refusal to listen to correction, truth, or divine revelation.

• This reflects the behavior of oppressive rulers and corrupt religious leaders who are unwilling to heed the message of repentance and righteousness.

Example:

• • King Ahab and Jezebel (1Kings 21):

    • They refused to listen to prophets like Elijah, instead silencing and persecuting those who spoke God’s truth, much like the deaf adder refusing to hear the charmers.

Charmers and the Futility of Reasoning with Wicked Leaders

• Charmers symbolize prophets, righteous leaders, or those attempting to call out the falsehoods of political and religious adversaries.

• The deaf adder’s refusal to listen to charmers represents the stubbornness and cunning of leaders who reject God’s Word to maintain their power.

Example:

• • Pharaoh’s hard heart (Exodus 7–11):

    • Despite Moses’ warnings (like a charmer's call), Pharaoh repeatedly hardened his heart, a political adversary refusing to listen to divine revelation.

The malicious disposition of the wicked is spiritually deaf and will not and cannot receive divine revelation.

John 8:43 ​​ Why do ye not understand My speech? even because ye cannot hear My word.

Psalm 140:1 ​​ To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. Deliver me, O Yahweh, from the evil man (H120- Adam): preserve me from the violent man (H376);

140:2 ​​ Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war.

140:3 ​​ They (Adamic men) have sharpened their tongues like a serpent (H5175); adders' poison is under their lips. Selah.

They employ their time in forging lies and calumnies against me; and those of the most virulent nature.

David seeks protection from individuals characterized by wickedness and violence. The terms "evil man" and "violent man" highlight the moral corruption and aggressive nature of his foes. They are filled with “mischiefs” and continually assembling for conflict against David.

David compares their speech to the sharp tongues of serpents, implying that their words are as harmful as snake bites. The metaphor of "adders' poison" under their lips underscores the deadly impact of their slander and deceit. ​​ 

The comparison to serpents emphasizes the cunning and treacherous nature of David's enemies. In biblical literature, serpents often symbolize deceit and danger.

• The apostle Paul cites Psalm 140:3 in Romans 3:13 to illustrate the universal sinfulness of humanity, highlighting the destructive power of evil speech.

Why does David use two different Hebrew words for 'man' in verse 1?

Psalm 140:1 “Deliver me, O Yahweh, from the evil man (H120): preserve me from the violent man (H376).”

Evil Man

• Strong's H120 adam: Refers to mankind in general, often highlighting the frailty and earthly nature of humans.

  • Here, 'adam is used with a negative qualifier (evil) to describe a man who embodies moral corruption and wickedness.

  • Emphasis: The focus is on the moral character—a man whose nature and intentions are evil and corrupt.

• Broader Meaning:

  • Often used to highlight the earthly nature of humanity, the term 'adam can imply that evil is inherent in human nature apart from God’s intervention.

  • It suggests a man who is morally perverse at his core, corrupted in his thoughts and motivations.

Violent Man

• Strong's H376: Refers to a man in a more individual and specific sense, often emphasizing strength, authority, or a distinct role (such as a warrior, leader, or husband).

  • Here, 'iysh is paired with the qualifier violent (often translated from the root chamac meaning violence, cruelty, or injustice).

  • Emphasis: Focuses on actions and behavior—a man characterized by physical aggression, oppression, and injustice.

• Broader Meaning:

  • 'iysh often highlights the strength or role of a man, suggesting that the violent man is not just evil at heart but also actively engages in oppressive and violent acts.

  • Suggests a person who uses their power and authority to harm others physically or politically.

• David’s prayer in Psalm 140:1 seeks deliverance from both kinds of evil:

  • H120 (‘adam): Men who are inwardly evil and deceitful, spreading lies and schemes.

  • H376 (‘iysh): Men who are outwardly violent and oppressive, using their power to cause harm.

Proverbs 23:29–35 offers a vivid depiction of the consequences of excessive alcohol consumption, employing metaphors and imagery to convey its dangers.

The passage begins with rhetorical questions highlighting the negative outcomes associated with overindulgence in alcohol: woe, sorrow, strife, complaints, unnecessary wounds, and bloodshot eyes. These symptoms are attributed to those who linger over wine and seek mixed drinks.

Proverbs 23:29 ​​ Who hath woe? who hath sorrow? who hath contentions? who hath babbling? who hath wounds without cause? who hath redness of eyes?

Isaiah 5:11 ​​ Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink; that continue until night, till wine inflame them!

5:22 ​​ Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:

​​ 23:30 ​​ (Answer to questions in v29) They that tarry long at the wine; they that go to seek mixed wine.

Ephesians 5:18 ​​ And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;

Psalm 75:8 ​​ For in the hand of Yahweh there is a cup, and the wine is red; it is full of mixture; and He poureth out of the same: but the dregs thereof, all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out, and drink them.

​​ 23:31 ​​ Look not you upon the wine when it is red, when it giveth his colour in the cup, when it moveth itself aright (flows smoothly).

Wine is described as alluring—red, sparkling, and smooth-going. This imagery warns against being captivated by its enticing appearance, which can lead to overconsumption.

​​ 23:32 ​​ At the last it biteth like a serpent (H5175), and stingeth like an adder (H6848 tsepha – poisonous viper).

Despite its allure, wine ultimately "bites like a serpent and stings like an adder." This metaphor suggests that while alcohol may seem pleasant initially, it can lead to sudden and severe harm, much like the unexpected bite of a venomous snake.

​​ 23:33 ​​ Thine eyes shall behold strange (harlot, alien) women, and your heart (mind) shall utter perverse things.

Intoxication leads to hallucinations ("your eyes will see strange things") and the utterance of perverse or irrational things, indicating a loss of mental clarity and moral restraint.

​​ 23:34 ​​ Yea, you shalt be as he that lieth down in the midst of the sea, or as he that lieth upon the top of a mast.

Mast is H2260 chibbel (khib-bale') and the meaning is uncertain. The mast is where the motion is the greatest. It's related word is H2254 chabal (khaw-bal') and means to pervert, destroy, offend, corrupt, and to bind.

The drunkard is compared to someone lying down in the heart of the sea or atop a ship's mast—both positions of extreme instability and danger, highlighting the loss of control and exposure to harm.

​​ 23:35 ​​ They struck me, I was not sick! They beat me, I did not know! When shall I wake up? Let me seek it again!(the drunkard returns to his drink).

Despite experiencing harm ("They struck me... they beat me"), the individual is numb to pain and seeks to continue drinking, illustrating the addictive cycle and denial often accompanying substance abuse.

It is wine which bites you like a serpent, not some supernatural devil. God is just telling you what happens if you drink too much wine.

Proverbs 30:19 and Ecclesiastes 10:8 and 11 are actual snakes and their characteristics. The meaning is they leave no trace behind them, an adulterous person may commit acts in secrecy. ​​ The eagle in the air, the serpent upon a rock, a ship in the sea, a man with a maid. These verses are about adultery.

Ecclesiastes 10:8 is about the man spoiling his neighbor's property, he may come to greater mischief: pulling out sticks, a serpent may bite him.

These verses are also directed at kings and people to take heed they do not rashly, and with violence, attempt to make changes in the established order of things in the Word of God or Nations.

So he that breaks down the hedges and fences of kingdoms and commonwealths, and breaks through the fundamental laws of a civil constitution, and especially that transgresses the laws of God, moral or civil, may expect to smart for it. (Gill)

Ecclesiastes 10:11 ​​ Surely the serpent (H5175) will bite without enchantment; and a babbler (evil speaker) is no better. ​​ 

Bite is 'nashak', meaning to strike with a sting (as a serpent); figuratively, to oppress with interest on a loan: - bite, lend upon usury.

Enchantment in a (bad sense), is by implication, an incantation (the act of enchanting).

A busy tattling body, that goes from house to house, and, in a private manner, speaks evil of civil governments, of ministers of the word, and of other persons; and; in a secret way, defames men, and detracts from their characters: such an one is like a venomous viper, a poisonous serpent or adder; and there is no more guarding against him than against such a creature that bites secretly. (Gill)

The serpent symbol carries layered meanings throughout scripture. Jacob prophesied Dan would be like a serpent, striking with stealth and strategy—mirrored in history, European heraldry, and military action. Moses was appointed by God as a divine representative to Pharaoh, and serpents were used by God both to judge and to heal, foreshadowing Jesus Christ's redemptive role. Witchcraft was defined not just as sorcery, but rebellion. The scapegoat is symbolic of misdirected blame, showing that sin must be confessed, not cast on others. And the Psalms and Proverbs showed the serpent as a metaphor for wicked speech, deception, and subtle destruction—warning us to stay rooted in truth and righteousness.

Begin Part 4 of the Audio Presentation here  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 

Isaiah 14:29 ​​ Rejoice not you, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent's (H5175) root shall come forth a cockatrice, and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent (H8314/H5774).

These are all descriptions of successive conquering nations. Some say that the 'serpent' is Tiglathpilneser king of Assyria; and by the 'cockatrice' Sennacherib; and by the 'fiery flying serpent' Nebuchadnezzar. Other's have Nebuchadnezzar and his sons, meant by the 'serpent, and after should come the Medes and Persians, signified by the 'cockatrice'; and after them the Macedonians, designed by the 'flying fiery serpent'. Other possibilities are that the 'serpent' is King Uzziah of Judah, the 'cockatrice Hezekiah, and Messiah as the fruit of Jesse, and His works among you as a flying serpent.

Isaiah 27:1 uses vivid imagery to convey God's judgment upon formidable adversaries:

Isaiah 27:1 ​​ In that day Yahweh with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent (H5175), even leviathan that crooked serpent (H5175); and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.

Leviathan= as we've seen in Job are earthly potentates, kings and empires. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Rome, United Nations.

The symbolism of the mythical creature reveals God's promise to punish the great enemy of His people.

Isaiah 45:5 ​​ For I am the Lord God, and there is no other God beside Me; I strengthened thee, and thou hast not known Me.

Belief in a great satanic being undermines God’s absolute sovereignty.

Deuteronomy 4:35 ​​ Unto you it was shewed, that you mightest know that Yahweh He is God; there is none else beside Him.

Deuteronomy 32:39 ​​ See now that I, even I, am He, and there is no god with Me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand.

​​ 45:6 ​​ That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside Me. I am Yahweh, and there is none else.

Psalm 102:15 ​​ So the nations shall fear the name of Yahweh, and all the kings of the land Your glory.

​​ 45:7 ​​ I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil (H7451)(adversity): I Yahweh do all these things.

God alone has ultimate power; idols (and by extension, devils) have none.

The term "evil" here is often understood as "calamity" or "disaster," indicating that God permits adversity as part of His divine plan. This proclamation challenges dualistic beliefs, such as those in Zoroastrianism, which posits two equal and opposing forces of good and evil. By affirming that He alone creates both light and darkness, peace and calamity, God asserts His sole sovereignty over the universe, leaving no room for the existence of an independent, opposing evil entity.

Who blinds the eyes?

Exodus 4:11
"And the LORD said unto him, Who hath made man's mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?"

God Himself declares that He is the one who makes people blind or deaf, emphasizing His sovereignty over human perception.

Deuteronomy 29:4
"Yet the LORD hath not given you a heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day."

Despite witnessing miracles, Israel could not perceive spiritual truth because God had not granted them the ability to understand.

Isaiah 6:9-10
"And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed."

God commands Isaiah to blind and harden the people of Israel as an act of judgment for being antinomians.

Psalm 119:70 ​​ Their heart is as fat as grease; but I delight in your law.

Isaiah 29:10
"For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath He covered."

The Lord deliberately blinds even prophets and rulers as a form of judgment.

Isaiah 44:18
"They have not known nor understood: for he hath shut their eyes, that they cannot see; and their hearts, that they cannot understand."

The Lord actively prevents people from understanding spiritual truths.

Ezekiel 12:2
"Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house."

Though they have physical sight, their spiritual blindness is a direct act of divine judgment.

New Testament

Matthew 13:13-15 (Quoting Isaiah 6:9-10)
"Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand... For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed..."

Jesus affirms that God’s judgment includes blinding people so they will not understand the gospel because they would not receive instruction.

Proverbs 9:9 ​​ Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning.

John 9:39
"And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind."

Christ explains that His coming results in both spiritual enlightenment and blindness, according to God's will.

John 12:39-40 (Quoting Isaiah 6:9-10)
"Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them."

The reason they could not believe is because God had blinded them.

Romans 11:8 (Quoting Deuteronomy 29:4 and Isaiah 29:10)
"According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear; unto this day."

Paul confirms that God Himself is the one who blinds people to the truth.

2Thessalonians 2:11-12
"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."

God actively sends delusion upon those who reject the truth.

God sovereignly controls perception, opening or closing eyes according to His will. Spiritual blindness often serves as divine judgment for persistent sin or rejection of truth, fulfilling His plan—whether by preserving a remnant, revealing truth in His timing, or bringing judgment. Jesus affirmed this, stating that His teaching both enlightens and blinds based on a person’s heart.

Isaiah 65:23-25 presents a prophetic vision of a harmonious and restored creation under divine blessing.

Isaiah 65:23 ​​ They (we Israelites) shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of Yahweh, and their offspring with them.

​​ 65:24 ​​ And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.

​​ 65:25 ​​ The wolf (symbol of Benjamin) and the lamb (Messiah) shall feed together, and the lion (Judah) shall eat straw like the bullock (Ephraim): and dust shall be the serpent's (H5175) meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain, saith Yahweh.

The wolf symbolizes the tribe of Benjamin, which all the apostles were Benjaminites, except the betrayer Judas Iscarioth who was an Edomite Jew. The lion symbolizes the lion of Judah and the bullock symbolizes Ephraim who is England. The straw which they are going to eat together is clean, uncontaminated peace after the adversaries are defeated.

The meat of the serpent represents the carnal, worldly, earthly minded men.

This is a prophecy of reigning with Jesus Christ during the Reformation and the symbolic 1000 years when Christian Society flourished without the antichrist influence of the Jews and usury between 800-1800 AD.

Jeremiah 8:17 employs vivid imagery, likening the impending Babylonian invaders to venomous serpents and cockatrices—mythical creatures symbolizing deadly threats. This metaphor underscores the inevitability and severity of the judgment facing Judah due to their persistent disobedience.

Jeremiah 8:17 ​​ For, behold, I will send serpents (H5175), cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite (lend upon usury) you, saith Yahweh.

The serpents in Jeremiah's day were the Babylonians. Today the serpents that bite (lend upon usury) are the Jewish Bankers of Mystery Babylon.

These serpents symbolize the Chaldean army, whose attacks would be as fatal as the bites of venomous snakes, and against whom no charm or strategy could prevail.

The phrase "which will not be charmed" indicates that these adversaries are beyond persuasion or appeasement: the Babylonians, like uncharmable serpents, are instruments of divine judgment that cannot be diverted or mitigated by human means.

In Jeremiah 46:22, the prophet uses the imagery of a serpent's voice to describe Egypt's reaction to the impending Babylonian invasion.

Jeremiah 46:22 ​​ The voice (of Egypt) thereof shall go like a serpent (H5175); for they (the Babylonians) shall march with an army, and come against her (Egypt) with axes, as hewers of wood.

The voice of serpents heard afar off; and so it may respect that Egypt's voice, once loud and boastful, will be reduced to a subdued tone.

Like as in Isaiah 29:4, where subdued speech symbolizes a state of humiliation and defeat.

The dreadful lamentation the Egyptians should make, when they should see the Chaldeans come upon them to destroy them; just as serpents in woods make a horrible noise, when they are set on fire, or are cut down, to which there is an allusion in the clauses following in chapter 46 of Jeremiah.

Amos 5:18-27 serves as a profound warning to those who complacently anticipate "the day of the Lord," mistakenly believing it will bring them light and security. Instead, the prophet Amos cautions that this day will usher in darkness and judgment due to the people's injustices and hollow religious practices.

Amos 5:19 ​​ As if a man did flee from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house, and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent (H5175- occult science, Judeo-Christianity) bit him.

This verse employs vivid imagery to illustrate the inescapability of divine judgment.

These proverbial expressions signify that the Israelites would not be safe in the day of the Lord, but rather fall into greater evils, and more distressing calamities.

The lion as Nebuchadnezzar. The bear as the Medes and Persians. The house represents the Temple, which many thought they were safe in, but God had left the Temple and the pagan Greeks defiled it. After that the Edomite counterfiet priestcraft and their traditions of men, followed by Catholicism, followed by 33,000 denominations and Judeo-Christianity.

The "wall" which one is going to lean against in our national house is spiritual salvation through our Master Christ Jesus. It is the same wall that is prophesied in Isaiah 60:18.

Isaiah 60:18 ​​ Violence shall no more be heard in thy land, wasting nor destruction within thy borders; but thou shalt call thy walls Salvation, and thy gates Praise.

One is inviting the sting of the Cockatrice if one seeks rest in spiritual salvation as preached by the so called 33,000 Christian denominations banded together in the Communistic Federal Council of Churches of (Anti)Christ which is sponsored and maintained by Jews in efforts to keep (the true identity, name and message of) Christ Jesus out of the church houses. One is guaranteed to receive Snake bite if one leans against the false wall of the so-called Christian spiritualist cults which deny the sovereignty of Jesus Christ.

The passage metaphorically conveys that superficial religious observances cannot shield one from the consequences of moral and ethical failures. The Israelites' reliance on ritualistic worship, devoid of genuine righteousness and justice, renders them vulnerable to unforeseen dangers, much like the serpent's unexpected bite.

Amos underscores that true devotion requires aligning one's actions with divine principles of justice and righteousness. Without this alignment, anticipated days of deliverance transform into occasions of darkness and calamity.

This passage serves as a timeless reminder that genuine faith is demonstrated through ethical conduct and social justice, not merely through ritualistic practices. It challenges individuals and communities to reflect on the authenticity of their devotion and the integrity of their actions.

Today's 'churches' should learn from Amos, because they look forward to the rapture, which, when that day comes, they will be in for a brood awakening. Judeo-Quistianity is a false wall.

Amos 9:1-10 presents a vivid depiction of inescapable divine judgment upon Israel, emphasizing that no refuge—be it in the heights of Mount Carmel or the depths of the sea—can shield them from God's retribution.

Amos 9:1 ​​ I saw Yahweh standing upon the altar: and He said, Smite the lintel of the door, that the  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ posts may shake: and cut them in the head, all of them; and I will slay the last of them with the  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ sword: he that fleeth of them shall not flee away, and he that escapeth of them shall not be  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ delivered.

Amos was in Bethel, and this is a reference to the temple housing that idol of the golden calf which had represented the state religion of Israel since the days of Jeroboam I.

​​ 9:2 ​​ Though they dig into hell, thence shall Mine hand take them; though they climb up to heaven, thence will I bring them down:

​​ 9:3 ​​ And though they hide themselves in the top of Carmel, I will search and take them out thence (Mount Carmel, known for its dense forests and caves, was considered a natural refuge. However, God declares that even there, His reach is absolute, and He will extract those who attempt to hide.); and though they be hid from My sight in the bottom of the sea (The imagery of descending to the ocean's depths symbolizes seeking the most concealed places. Yet, even in such isolation, God's sovereignty prevails.), thence will I command the serpent (H5175), and he shall bite them: (The "serpent" here is a metaphorical symbol of impending danger or oppressive forces. This underscores that evasion is futile; divine judgment is unavoidable.)

All these are metaphorical expressions, to show the impossibility of escape. The 'serpent' is a symbol of cruel and oppressive kings, or empires. They were not escaping the Babylonian invasion.

​​ 9:4 ​​ And though they go into captivity before their enemies, thence will I command the sword, and it shall slay them: and I will set Mine eyes upon them for evil, and not for good.  ​​​​ (Lev 26:33, 17:10)

The guilty will certainly be punished. If they enter the sacred place of worship, even that will not shelter them.

Let them climb ever so high, or burrow ever so deep; let them scale the loftiest hills, or dive into the deepest seas-the consequences of their sins will overtake them.

The message of Amos 9:1-10 is timeless, reminding individuals and nations that accountability is inevitable. It calls for introspection and alignment with moral and ethical standards, emphasizing that genuine repentance and righteousness are the paths to reconciliation and restoration.

Micah 7:17 employs vivid imagery to depict the profound humiliation and submission of nations before Yahweh.

The prophet laments over the lack of godly individuals, using the metaphor of seeking fruit after harvest and finding none.

In verses 15-17 Micah discusses God's promise to show wonders as in the days of the Exodus, leading nations to humble themselves and fear the Lord.

Micah 7:17 ​​ They shall lick the dust like a serpent (H5175), they shall move out of their holes like worms of the earth: they shall be afraid of Yahweh our God, and shall fear because of You.

The nations which shall “lick the dust like a serpent” are all of Israel's enemies, those nations gathered against Israel which are mentioned in the “last days” prophecy of Micah 4:11.

• "They shall lick the dust like a serpent": This phrase symbolizes utter defeat and abasement. It echoes the curse upon the serpent in Genesis 3:14, condemning it to crawl and consume dust, representing a state of degradation.

• "They shall move out of their holes like worms of the earth": This imagery portrays enemies emerging from their hiding places in fear and submission, akin to creatures reluctantly leaving their burrows.

• "They shall be afraid of Yahweh our God, and shall fear because of You": The nations, witnessing God's mighty acts, will stand in awe and dread of His power and His people's restored position.